LRLCY
Price
$93.10
Change
+$0.48 (+0.52%)
Updated
Aug 27 closing price
Capitalization
249B
54 days until earnings call
PIGEF
Price
$11.87
Change
+$1.40 (+13.37%)
Updated
Mar 24 closing price
Capitalization
1.46B
Interact to see
Advertisement

LRLCY vs PIGEF

Header iconLRLCY vs PIGEF Comparison
Open Charts LRLCY vs PIGEFBanner chart's image
L'Oreal
Price$93.10
Change+$0.48 (+0.52%)
Volume$82.59K
Capitalization249B
Pigeon
Price$11.87
Change+$1.40 (+13.37%)
Volume$8.7K
Capitalization1.46B
LRLCY vs PIGEF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
LRLCY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LRLCY vs. PIGEF commentary
Aug 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LRLCY is a StrongBuy and PIGEF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 29, 2025
Stock price -- (LRLCY: $93.10 vs. PIGEF: $11.87)
Brand notoriety: LRLCY and PIGEF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Household/Personal Care industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LRLCY: 71% vs. PIGEF: 100%
Market capitalization -- LRLCY: $249B vs. PIGEF: $1.46B
LRLCY [@Household/Personal Care] is valued at $249B. PIGEF’s [@Household/Personal Care] market capitalization is $1.46B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Household/Personal Care] industry ranges from $364.59B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Household/Personal Care] industry is $21.6B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LRLCY’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePIGEF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • LRLCY’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • PIGEF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, LRLCY is a better buy in the long-term than PIGEF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LRLCY’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • LRLCY’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

LRLCY (@Household/Personal Care) experienced а -1.35% price change this week, while PIGEF (@Household/Personal Care) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Household/Personal Care industry was +0.54%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.48%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.84%.

Reported Earning Dates

LRLCY is expected to report earnings on Oct 21, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Household/Personal Care (+0.54% weekly)

Household/Personal Care companies sell products for home cleaning and/or personal hygiene and grooming purposes. Products of this industry include detergents, shampoos, soaps, cosmetics, fabric conditioners and infant care fragrances. Procter & Gamble, Unilever, Estee Lauder and Colgate-Palmolive are some of the biggest names in the business. A lot of the products become a necessary part of people’s daily routine, and therefore the industry is relatively less vulnerable to macroeconomic downturns. At the same time, product quality, consumer safety, and ease of use are extremely critical factors for a company to survive competition and earn recognition in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LRLCY($249B) has a higher market cap than PIGEF($1.46B). LRLCY has higher P/E ratio than PIGEF: LRLCY (35.28) vs PIGEF (23.44). LRLCY YTD gains are higher at: 34.677 vs. PIGEF (12.661). PIGEF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 18.3B vs. LRLCY (10.7B). PIGEF has more cash in the bank: 34.1B vs. LRLCY (4.82B). PIGEF has less debt than LRLCY: PIGEF (0) vs LRLCY (8.83B). PIGEF has higher revenues than LRLCY: PIGEF (107B) vs LRLCY (43.8B).
LRLCYPIGEFLRLCY / PIGEF
Capitalization249B1.46B17,020%
EBITDA10.7B18.3B58%
Gain YTD34.67712.661274%
P/E Ratio35.2823.44150%
Revenue43.8B107B41%
Total Cash4.82B34.1B14%
Total Debt8.83B0-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LRLCY vs PIGEF: Fundamental Ratings
LRLCY
PIGEF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2149
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
53
Fair valued
16
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
49100
SMR RATING
1..100
9420
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4652
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3866
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
9050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PIGEF's Valuation (16) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LRLCY (53). This means that PIGEF’s stock grew somewhat faster than LRLCY’s over the last 12 months.

LRLCY's Profit vs Risk Rating (49) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PIGEF (100). This means that LRLCY’s stock grew somewhat faster than PIGEF’s over the last 12 months.

PIGEF's SMR Rating (20) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for LRLCY (94). This means that PIGEF’s stock grew significantly faster than LRLCY’s over the last 12 months.

LRLCY's Price Growth Rating (46) in the null industry is in the same range as PIGEF (52). This means that LRLCY’s stock grew similarly to PIGEF’s over the last 12 months.

LRLCY's P/E Growth Rating (38) in the null industry is in the same range as PIGEF (66). This means that LRLCY’s stock grew similarly to PIGEF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LRLCYPIGEF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
52%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
7%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
5%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 28 days ago
61%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
43%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LRLCY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
EDUC1.080.01
+0.93%
Educational Development Corp
BATRK44.850.16
+0.36%
Atlanta Braves Holdings
NPB17.770.05
+0.28%
Northpointe Bancshares Inc
WY26.12-0.05
-0.19%
Weyerhaeuser Company
KWM1.86-0.03
-1.59%
K Wave Media Ltd

LRLCY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LRLCY has been loosely correlated with BDRFY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LRLCY jumps, then BDRFY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LRLCY
1D Price
Change %
LRLCY100%
+0.52%
BDRFY - LRLCY
64%
Loosely correlated
+0.26%
LRLCF - LRLCY
57%
Loosely correlated
+0.99%
COTY - LRLCY
54%
Loosely correlated
+13.82%
EL - LRLCY
43%
Loosely correlated
+3.11%
HENKY - LRLCY
40%
Loosely correlated
-0.92%
More

PIGEF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PIGEF and LRLCF have been poorly correlated (+4% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PIGEF and LRLCF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PIGEF
1D Price
Change %
PIGEF100%
N/A
LRLCF - PIGEF
4%
Poorly correlated
+0.99%
LRLCY - PIGEF
2%
Poorly correlated
+0.52%
NBBTF - PIGEF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PGID - PIGEF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PORBF - PIGEF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More