LRLCY
Price
$85.66
Change
+$0.32 (+0.37%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
229.24B
24 days until earnings call
RBGLY
Price
$14.95
Change
+$0.01 (+0.07%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
50.53B
25 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

LRLCY vs RBGLY

Header iconLRLCY vs RBGLY Comparison
Open Charts LRLCY vs RBGLYBanner chart's image
L'Oreal
Price$85.66
Change+$0.32 (+0.37%)
Volume$71.52K
Capitalization229.24B
Reckitt Benckiser Group
Price$14.95
Change+$0.01 (+0.07%)
Volume$318.28K
Capitalization50.53B
LRLCY vs RBGLY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
LRLCY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RBGLY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LRLCY vs. RBGLY commentary
Sep 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LRLCY is a Hold and RBGLY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 27, 2025
Stock price -- (LRLCY: $85.66 vs. RBGLY: $14.95)
Brand notoriety: LRLCY and RBGLY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Household/Personal Care industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LRLCY: 65% vs. RBGLY: 102%
Market capitalization -- LRLCY: $229.24B vs. RBGLY: $50.53B
LRLCY [@Household/Personal Care] is valued at $229.24B. RBGLY’s [@Household/Personal Care] market capitalization is $50.53B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Household/Personal Care] industry ranges from $356.92B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Household/Personal Care] industry is $21.01B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LRLCY’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileRBGLY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • LRLCY’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • RBGLY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, RBGLY is a better buy in the long-term than LRLCY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LRLCY’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RBGLY’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LRLCY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • RBGLY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, RBGLY is a better buy in the short-term than LRLCY.

Price Growth

LRLCY (@Household/Personal Care) experienced а -1.39% price change this week, while RBGLY (@Household/Personal Care) price change was -3.42% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Household/Personal Care industry was -2.09%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.52%, and the average quarterly price growth was -2.53%.

Reported Earning Dates

LRLCY is expected to report earnings on Oct 21, 2025.

RBGLY is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Household/Personal Care (-2.09% weekly)

Household/Personal Care companies sell products for home cleaning and/or personal hygiene and grooming purposes. Products of this industry include detergents, shampoos, soaps, cosmetics, fabric conditioners and infant care fragrances. Procter & Gamble, Unilever, Estee Lauder and Colgate-Palmolive are some of the biggest names in the business. A lot of the products become a necessary part of people’s daily routine, and therefore the industry is relatively less vulnerable to macroeconomic downturns. At the same time, product quality, consumer safety, and ease of use are extremely critical factors for a company to survive competition and earn recognition in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LRLCY($229B) has a higher market cap than RBGLY($50.5B). LRLCY has higher P/E ratio than RBGLY: LRLCY (31.94) vs RBGLY (30.28). RBGLY YTD gains are higher at: 29.479 vs. LRLCY (23.914). LRLCY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 10.7B vs. RBGLY (2.77B). LRLCY has more cash in the bank: 4.82B vs. RBGLY (963M). LRLCY has less debt than RBGLY: LRLCY (8.83B) vs RBGLY (9.29B). LRLCY has higher revenues than RBGLY: LRLCY (43.8B) vs RBGLY (14B).
LRLCYRBGLYLRLCY / RBGLY
Capitalization229B50.5B453%
EBITDA10.7B2.77B387%
Gain YTD23.91429.47981%
P/E Ratio31.9430.28105%
Revenue43.8B14B313%
Total Cash4.82B963M501%
Total Debt8.83B9.29B95%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LRLCY vs RBGLY: Fundamental Ratings
LRLCY
RBGLY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5660
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
54
Fair valued
28
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
58100
SMR RATING
1..100
9496
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5849
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5317
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
7585

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

RBGLY's Valuation (28) in the null industry is in the same range as LRLCY (54). This means that RBGLY’s stock grew similarly to LRLCY’s over the last 12 months.

LRLCY's Profit vs Risk Rating (58) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RBGLY (100). This means that LRLCY’s stock grew somewhat faster than RBGLY’s over the last 12 months.

LRLCY's SMR Rating (94) in the null industry is in the same range as RBGLY (96). This means that LRLCY’s stock grew similarly to RBGLY’s over the last 12 months.

RBGLY's Price Growth Rating (49) in the null industry is in the same range as LRLCY (58). This means that RBGLY’s stock grew similarly to LRLCY’s over the last 12 months.

RBGLY's P/E Growth Rating (17) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LRLCY (53). This means that RBGLY’s stock grew somewhat faster than LRLCY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LRLCYRBGLY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
41%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
40%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
48%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
40%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
42%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 20 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 20 days ago
49%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
40%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
54%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
45%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LRLCY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RBGLY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DRS43.941.59
+3.75%
Leonardo DRS
ASGN47.870.54
+1.14%
ASGN
SSBI12.090.07
+0.58%
Summit State Bank
LE14.950.07
+0.47%
Lands' End
QNRX7.28-0.13
-1.73%
Quoin Pharmaceuticals Ltd

LRLCY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LRLCY has been loosely correlated with BDRFY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LRLCY jumps, then BDRFY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LRLCY
1D Price
Change %
LRLCY100%
+0.37%
BDRFY - LRLCY
64%
Loosely correlated
+1.09%
LRLCF - LRLCY
57%
Loosely correlated
+2.93%
COTY - LRLCY
54%
Loosely correlated
+2.04%
EL - LRLCY
43%
Loosely correlated
+3.18%
HENKY - LRLCY
40%
Loosely correlated
+0.27%
More

RBGLY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RBGLY has been closely correlated with RBGPF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RBGLY jumps, then RBGPF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RBGLY
1D Price
Change %
RBGLY100%
+0.07%
RBGPF - RBGLY
69%
Closely correlated
-5.02%
UNLRF - RBGLY
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LRLCY - RBGLY
26%
Poorly correlated
+0.37%
BDRFY - RBGLY
26%
Poorly correlated
+1.09%
HENKY - RBGLY
25%
Poorly correlated
+0.27%
More