Ad is loading...
LRSCX vs SSGSX
LRSCX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts LRSCX vs SSGSX
Lord Abbett Small Cap Value A
Price$12.98
Change-$1.17 (-8.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets358.36M
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$40.36
Change-$3.24 (-7.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.88B
LRSCX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LRSCX vs. SSGSX commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LRSCX is a Hold and SSGSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.88B vs. LRSCX (358M). SSGSX pays higher dividends than LRSCX: SSGSX (0.52) vs LRSCX (0.02). LRSCX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: LRSCX (29 years) vs SSGSX (26 years). SSGSX (1.26) is less costly to investors than LRSCX (1.19). LRSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 42.00 vs. SSGSX (37.00). LRSCX (6%) and SSGSX (6%) have equivalent initial investment costs. LRSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than SSGSX: LRSCX (1000) vs SSGSX (2500). LRSCX (-8.99) and SSGSX (-9.24) have marching annual gain over last year. LRSCX return over 5 years is better than : 66.88 vs. SSGSX (51.13).
| LRSCX | SSGSX | LRSCX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.19 | 1.26 | 94% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.19 | 1.26 | 94% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -7.335 | -6.095 | 120% |
| Front Load | 6% | 6% | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 358M | 5.88B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.02 | 0.52 | 4% |
| Returns for 1 year | -8.99 | -9.24 | 97% |
| Returns for 3 years | -4.06 | -10.59 | 38% |
| Returns for 5 years | 66.88 | 51.13 | 131% |
| Returns for 10 years | -48.55 | 10.74 | -452% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers