Ad is loading...
LRSCX vs SSGSX
LRSCX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts LRSCX vs SSGSX
Lord Abbett Small Cap Value A
Price$13.19
Change+$0.33 (+2.57%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets328.69M
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$40.69
Change+$0.63 (+1.57%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.33B
LRSCX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LRSCX vs. SSGSX commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LRSCX is a Buy and SSGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.33B vs. LRSCX (329M). SSGSX pays higher dividends than LRSCX: SSGSX (0.52) vs LRSCX (0.02). LRSCX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: LRSCX (29 years) vs SSGSX (26 years). SSGSX (1.26) is less costly to investors than LRSCX (1.19). LRSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 42.00 vs. SSGSX (37.00). LRSCX (6%) and SSGSX (6%) have equivalent initial investment costs. LRSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than SSGSX: LRSCX (1000) vs SSGSX (2500). SSGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -14.61 vs. LRSCX (-15.49). LRSCX return over 5 years is better than : 32.49 vs. SSGSX (23.96).
| LRSCX | SSGSX | LRSCX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.19 | 1.26 | 94% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.19 | 1.26 | 94% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -15.783 | -13.720 | 115% |
| Front Load | 6% | 6% | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 329M | 5.33B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.02 | 0.52 | 4% |
| Returns for 1 year | -15.49 | -14.61 | 106% |
| Returns for 3 years | -8.92 | -16.35 | 55% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.49 | 23.96 | 136% |
| Returns for 10 years | -52.76 | 2.97 | -1,777% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers