Ad is loading...
LRSFX vs SSGSX
LRSFX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts LRSFX vs SSGSX
Lord Abbett Small Cap Value F
Price$15.05
Change-$0.46 (-2.97%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets378.4M
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$45.80
Change-$0.83 (-1.78%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.33B
LRSFX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LRSFX vs. SSGSX commentary
Feb 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LRSFX is a Hold and SSGSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 6.33B vs. LRSFX (378M). SSGSX pays higher dividends than LRSFX: SSGSX (0.35) vs LRSFX (0.23). LRSFX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: LRSFX (17 years) vs SSGSX (26 years). LRSFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 34.00 vs. SSGSX (32.00). LRSFX has a lower initial minimum investment than SSGSX: LRSFX (0) vs SSGSX (2500). SSGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.03 vs. LRSFX (-1.23). SSGSX return over 5 years is better than : 6.73 vs. LRSFX (0.70).
| LRSFX | SSGSX | LRSFX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.966 | 0.431 | -689% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 378M | 6.33B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.23 | 0.35 | 64% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.23 | -1.03 | 119% |
| Returns for 3 years | 1.96 | -3.55 | -55% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.70 | 6.73 | 10% |
| Returns for 10 years | -44.11 | 21.22 | -208% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...