Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LRSFX vs SSGSX
LRSFX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts LRSFX vs SSGSX
Lord Abbett Small Cap Value F
Price$15.44
Change+$0.14 (+0.92%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets370.65M
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$46.89
Change+$0.35 (+0.75%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.44B
LRSFX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LRSFX vs. SSGSX commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LRSFX is a Hold and SSGSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.44B vs. LRSFX (371M). SSGSX pays higher dividends than LRSFX: SSGSX (0.48) vs LRSFX (0.16). LRSFX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: LRSFX (18 years) vs SSGSX (27 years). SSGSX (1.26) is less costly to investors than LRSFX (1.06). LRSFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 42.00 vs. SSGSX (37.00). LRSFX has a lower initial minimum investment than SSGSX: LRSFX (0) vs SSGSX (2500). SSGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -4.22 vs. LRSFX (-8.68). LRSFX return over 5 years is better than : 22.58 vs. SSGSX (19.51).
| LRSFX | SSGSX | LRSFX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 1.26 | 84% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 1.26 | 84% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.354 | 0.237 | -571% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 371M | 5.44B | 7% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.16 | 0.48 | 34% |
| Returns for 1 year | -8.68 | -4.22 | 206% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.50 | 6.47 | 394% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.58 | 19.51 | 116% |
| Returns for 10 years | -41.55 | 19.36 | -215% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers