Ad is loading...
LRSFX vs SSGSX
LRSFX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts LRSFX vs SSGSX
Lord Abbett Small Cap Value F
Price$13.75
Change+$0.06 (+0.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets342.5M
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$41.78
Change+$0.72 (+1.75%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.44B
LRSFX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LRSFX vs. SSGSX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LRSFX is a Buy and SSGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.44B vs. LRSFX (343M). SSGSX pays higher dividends than LRSFX: SSGSX (0.54) vs LRSFX (0.18). LRSFX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: LRSFX (18 years) vs SSGSX (26 years). SSGSX (1.26) is less costly to investors than LRSFX (1.06). LRSFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 42.00 vs. SSGSX (37.00). LRSFX has a lower initial minimum investment than SSGSX: LRSFX (0) vs SSGSX (2500). LRSFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -12.89 vs. SSGSX (-13.71). LRSFX return over 5 years is better than : 27.67 vs. SSGSX (20.02).
| LRSFX | SSGSX | LRSFX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 1.26 | 84% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 1.26 | 84% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -11.734 | -11.566 | 101% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 343M | 5.44B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.18 | 0.54 | 33% |
| Returns for 1 year | -12.89 | -13.71 | 94% |
| Returns for 3 years | 3.26 | -10.63 | -31% |
| Returns for 5 years | 27.67 | 20.02 | 138% |
| Returns for 10 years | -48.75 | 5.67 | -860% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...