Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LRSFX vs SSGSX
LRSFX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts LRSFX vs SSGSX
Lord Abbett Small Cap Value F
Price$14.35
Change+$0.19 (+1.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets354.71M
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$42.96
Change+$0.52 (+1.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.55B
LRSFX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LRSFX vs. SSGSX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LRSFX is a Buy and SSGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.55B vs. LRSFX (355M). SSGSX pays higher dividends than LRSFX: SSGSX (0.52) vs LRSFX (0.18). LRSFX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: LRSFX (18 years) vs SSGSX (26 years). SSGSX (1.26) is less costly to investors than LRSFX (1.06). LRSFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 42.00 vs. SSGSX (37.00). LRSFX has a lower initial minimum investment than SSGSX: LRSFX (0) vs SSGSX (2500). SSGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -9.66 vs. LRSFX (-10.36). LRSFX return over 5 years is better than : 11.93 vs. SSGSX (8.79).
| LRSFX | SSGSX | LRSFX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 1.26 | 84% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 1.26 | 84% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -8.704 | -8.594 | 101% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 355M | 5.55B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.18 | 0.52 | 34% |
| Returns for 1 year | -10.36 | -9.66 | 107% |
| Returns for 3 years | -0.65 | -12.89 | 5% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.93 | 8.79 | 136% |
| Returns for 10 years | -47.57 | 8.65 | -550% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement