Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LRSFX vs SSGSX
LRSFX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts LRSFX vs SSGSX
Lord Abbett Small Cap Value F
Price$15.63
Change-$0.08 (-0.51%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets380.65M
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$46.90
Change-$0.32 (-0.68%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.63B
LRSFX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LRSFX vs. SSGSX commentary
Aug 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LRSFX is a Buy and SSGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.63B vs. LRSFX (381M). SSGSX pays higher dividends than LRSFX: SSGSX (0.50) vs LRSFX (0.16). LRSFX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: LRSFX (18 years) vs SSGSX (26 years). SSGSX (1.26) is less costly to investors than LRSFX (1.06). LRSFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 42.00 vs. SSGSX (37.00). LRSFX has a lower initial minimum investment than SSGSX: LRSFX (0) vs SSGSX (2500). SSGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -4.73 vs. LRSFX (-8.47). LRSFX return over 5 years is better than : 28.21 vs. SSGSX (22.50).
| LRSFX | SSGSX | LRSFX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 1.26 | 84% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 1.26 | 84% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.289 | 1.701 | 76% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 381M | 5.63B | 7% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.16 | 0.50 | 33% |
| Returns for 1 year | -8.47 | -4.73 | 179% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.75 | -1.71 | -981% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.21 | 22.50 | 125% |
| Returns for 10 years | -37.82 | 24.13 | -157% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers