Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LRSFX vs SSGSX
LRSFX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts LRSFX vs SSGSX
Lord Abbett Small Cap Value F
Price$15.64
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets378.88M
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$47.04
Change-$0.06 (-0.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.59B
LRSFX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LRSFX vs. SSGSX commentary
Sep 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LRSFX is a Hold and SSGSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.59B vs. LRSFX (379M). SSGSX pays higher dividends than LRSFX: SSGSX (0.47) vs LRSFX (0.16). LRSFX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: LRSFX (18 years) vs SSGSX (26 years). SSGSX (1.26) is less costly to investors than LRSFX (1.06). LRSFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 42.00 vs. SSGSX (37.00). LRSFX has a lower initial minimum investment than SSGSX: LRSFX (0) vs SSGSX (2500). SSGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.91 vs. LRSFX (-3.61). LRSFX return over 5 years is better than : 33.49 vs. SSGSX (27.21).
| LRSFX | SSGSX | LRSFX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 1.26 | 84% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 1.26 | 84% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.838 | 1.443 | 58% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 379M | 5.59B | 7% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.16 | 0.47 | 34% |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.61 | -0.91 | 395% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.69 | 1.77 | 1,170% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.49 | 27.21 | 123% |
| Returns for 10 years | -38.56 | 23.85 | -162% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers