Ad is loading...
LRSFX vs SSGSX
LRSFX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts LRSFX vs SSGSX
Lord Abbett Small Cap Value F
Price$12.84
Change+$0.14 (+1.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets316.52M
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$39.45
Change+$0.34 (+0.87%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.22B
LRSFX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LRSFX vs. SSGSX commentary
Apr 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LRSFX is a Hold and SSGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.22B vs. LRSFX (317M). SSGSX pays higher dividends than LRSFX: SSGSX (0.52) vs LRSFX (0.18). LRSFX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: LRSFX (18 years) vs SSGSX (26 years). SSGSX (1.26) is less costly to investors than LRSFX (1.04). LRSFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 42.00 vs. SSGSX (37.00). LRSFX has a lower initial minimum investment than SSGSX: LRSFX (0) vs SSGSX (2500). SSGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -14.16 vs. LRSFX (-15.03). LRSFX return over 5 years is better than : 28.18 vs. SSGSX (19.58).
| LRSFX | SSGSX | LRSFX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 1.26 | 83% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 1.26 | 83% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -18.117 | -15.141 | 120% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 317M | 5.22B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.18 | 0.52 | 34% |
| Returns for 1 year | -15.03 | -14.16 | 106% |
| Returns for 3 years | -12.43 | -17.25 | 72% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.18 | 19.58 | 144% |
| Returns for 10 years | -53.16 | 1.75 | -3,029% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers