Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LRSQX vs SSGSX
LRSQX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts LRSQX vs SSGSX
Lord Abbett Small Cap Value R2
Price$13.04
Change+$0.05 (+0.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets373.56M
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$45.37
Change+$0.32 (+0.71%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.7B
LRSQX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LRSQX vs. SSGSX commentary
Jul 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LRSQX is a Hold and SSGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.7B vs. LRSQX (374M). SSGSX pays higher dividends than LRSQX: SSGSX (0.51) vs LRSQX (0.00). LRSQX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: LRSQX (17 years) vs SSGSX (26 years). LRSQX (1.56) is less costly to investors than SSGSX (1.26). LRSQX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 42.00 vs. SSGSX (37.00). LRSQX has a lower initial minimum investment than SSGSX: LRSQX (0) vs SSGSX (2500). SSGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -9.42 vs. LRSQX (-11.99). SSGSX return over 5 years is better than : 22.62 vs. LRSQX (21.29).
| LRSQX | SSGSX | LRSQX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.56 | 1.26 | 124% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.56 | 1.26 | 124% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.036 | -2.972 | 69% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 374M | 5.7B | 7% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.51 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -11.99 | -9.42 | 127% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.35 | -2.83 | -508% |
| Returns for 5 years | 21.29 | 22.62 | 94% |
| Returns for 10 years | -50.00 | 17.56 | -285% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers