Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LRSQX vs SSGSX
LRSQX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts LRSQX vs SSGSX
Lord Abbett Small Cap Value R2
Price$12.11
Change-$0.23 (-1.86%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets360.97M
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$42.53
Change-$0.78 (-1.80%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.63B
LRSQX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LRSQX vs. SSGSX commentary
Jun 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LRSQX is a Hold and SSGSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.63B vs. LRSQX (361M). SSGSX pays higher dividends than LRSQX: SSGSX (0.52) vs LRSQX (0.00). LRSQX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: LRSQX (17 years) vs SSGSX (26 years). LRSQX (1.56) is less costly to investors than SSGSX (1.26). LRSQX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 42.00 vs. SSGSX (37.00). LRSQX has a lower initial minimum investment than SSGSX: LRSQX (0) vs SSGSX (2500). SSGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -6.68 vs. LRSQX (-9.46). SSGSX return over 5 years is better than : 23.95 vs. LRSQX (19.23).
| LRSQX | SSGSX | LRSQX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.56 | 1.26 | 124% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.56 | 1.26 | 124% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -6.938 | -6.720 | 103% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 361M | 5.63B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.52 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -9.46 | -6.68 | 142% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.47 | -2.14 | -490% |
| Returns for 5 years | 19.23 | 23.95 | 80% |
| Returns for 10 years | -54.43 | 9.06 | -601% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers