Ad is loading...
LRSQX vs SSGSX
LRSQX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts LRSQX vs SSGSX
Lord Abbett Small Cap Value R2
Price$10.72
Change-$0.51 (-4.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets327.74M
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$38.61
Change-$1.79 (-4.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.42B
LRSQX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LRSQX vs. SSGSX commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LRSQX is a Hold and SSGSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.42B vs. LRSQX (328M). SSGSX pays higher dividends than LRSQX: SSGSX (0.52) vs LRSQX (0.00). LRSQX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: LRSQX (17 years) vs SSGSX (26 years). LRSQX (1.54) is less costly to investors than SSGSX (1.26). LRSQX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 42.00 vs. SSGSX (37.00). LRSQX has a lower initial minimum investment than SSGSX: LRSQX (0) vs SSGSX (2500). SSGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -14.20 vs. LRSQX (-16.88). LRSQX return over 5 years is better than : 19.98 vs. SSGSX (18.77).
| LRSQX | SSGSX | LRSQX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.54 | 1.26 | 122% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.54 | 1.26 | 122% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -15.309 | -12.987 | 118% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 328M | 5.42B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.52 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -16.88 | -14.20 | 119% |
| Returns for 3 years | -10.87 | -13.85 | 79% |
| Returns for 5 years | 19.98 | 18.77 | 106% |
| Returns for 10 years | -57.96 | 3.07 | -1,888% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...