Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LRSQX vs SSGSX
LRSQX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts LRSQX vs SSGSX
Lord Abbett Small Cap Value R2
Price$12.47
Change+$0.03 (+0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets346.9M
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$44.46
Change+$0.08 (+0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.98B
LRSQX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LRSQX vs. SSGSX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LRSQX is a Hold and SSGSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 4.98B vs. LRSQX (347M). SSGSX pays higher dividends than LRSQX: SSGSX (0.49) vs LRSQX (0.00). LRSQX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: LRSQX (18 years) vs SSGSX (27 years). LRSQX (1.56) is less costly to investors than SSGSX (1.26). LRSQX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 42.00 vs. SSGSX (37.00). LRSQX has a lower initial minimum investment than SSGSX: LRSQX (0) vs SSGSX (2500). SSGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -14.44 vs. LRSQX (-19.69). SSGSX return over 5 years is better than : 2.06 vs. LRSQX (-0.64).
| LRSQX | SSGSX | LRSQX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.56 | 1.26 | 124% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.56 | 1.26 | 124% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -6.184 | -4.415 | 140% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 347M | 4.98B | 7% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.49 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -19.69 | -14.44 | 136% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.96 | -10.47 | -57% |
| Returns for 5 years | -0.64 | 2.06 | -31% |
| Returns for 10 years | -52.15 | 12.64 | -413% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement