Ad is loading...
LRSQX vs SSGSX
LRSQX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts LRSQX vs SSGSX
Lord Abbett Small Cap Value R2
Price$13.63
Change+$0.14 (+1.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets401.7M
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$47.98
Change+$0.40 (+0.84%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.65B
LRSQX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LRSQX vs. SSGSX commentary
Jan 31, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LRSQX is a Hold and SSGSX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 6.65B vs. LRSQX (402M). SSGSX pays higher dividends than LRSQX: SSGSX (0.35) vs LRSQX (0.00). LRSQX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: LRSQX (17 years) vs SSGSX (26 years). LRSQX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 34.00 vs. SSGSX (32.00). LRSQX has a lower initial minimum investment than SSGSX: LRSQX (0) vs SSGSX (2500). LRSQX (3.69) and SSGSX (3.54) have marching annual gain over last year. SSGSX return over 5 years is better than : 11.94 vs. LRSQX (2.35).
| LRSQX | SSGSX | LRSQX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.735 | 2.477 | 70% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 402M | 6.65B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.35 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.69 | 3.54 | 104% |
| Returns for 3 years | 1.58 | -1.87 | -85% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.35 | 11.94 | 20% |
| Returns for 10 years | -46.17 | 28.90 | -160% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers