Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LRSRX vs SSGSX
LRSRX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts LRSRX vs SSGSX
Lord Abbett Small Cap Value R3
Price$13.40
Change-$0.17 (-1.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets374.37M
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$45.49
Change-$0.48 (-1.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.56B
LRSRX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LRSRX vs. SSGSX commentary
Aug 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LRSRX is a Hold and SSGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.56B vs. LRSRX (374M). SSGSX pays higher dividends than LRSRX: SSGSX (0.50) vs LRSRX (0.00). LRSRX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: LRSRX (17 years) vs SSGSX (26 years). LRSRX (1.46) is less costly to investors than SSGSX (1.26). LRSRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 42.00 vs. SSGSX (37.00). LRSRX has a lower initial minimum investment than SSGSX: LRSRX (0) vs SSGSX (2500). SSGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -4.53 vs. LRSRX (-8.87). SSGSX (17.10) and LRSRX (16.98) have equivalent 5 years return.
| LRSRX | SSGSX | LRSRX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.46 | 1.26 | 116% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.46 | 1.26 | 116% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.381 | -0.991 | 139% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 374M | 5.56B | 7% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.50 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -8.87 | -4.53 | 196% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.85 | -8.81 | -66% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.98 | 17.10 | 99% |
| Returns for 10 years | -48.12 | 16.44 | -293% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement