Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LRSRX vs SSGSX
LRSRX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts LRSRX vs SSGSX
Lord Abbett Small Cap Value R3
Price$13.93
Change+$0.25 (+1.83%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets381.85M
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$47.38
Change+$0.08 (+0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.64B
LRSRX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LRSRX vs. SSGSX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LRSRX is a Buy and SSGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.64B vs. LRSRX (382M). SSGSX pays higher dividends than LRSRX: SSGSX (0.47) vs LRSRX (0.00). LRSRX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: LRSRX (17 years) vs SSGSX (26 years). LRSRX (1.46) is less costly to investors than SSGSX (1.26). LRSRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 42.00 vs. SSGSX (37.00). LRSRX has a lower initial minimum investment than SSGSX: LRSRX (0) vs SSGSX (2500). SSGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.56 vs. LRSRX (-6.01). LRSRX (23.27) and SSGSX (22.95) have equivalent 5 years return.
| LRSRX | SSGSX | LRSRX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.46 | 1.26 | 116% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.46 | 1.26 | 116% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.235 | 2.046 | 60% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 382M | 5.64B | 7% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.47 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.01 | -1.56 | 385% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.29 | 3.97 | 511% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.27 | 22.95 | 101% |
| Returns for 10 years | -44.09 | 24.71 | -178% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement