Ad is loading...
LRSRX vs SSGSX
LRSRX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts LRSRX vs SSGSX
Lord Abbett Small Cap Value R3
Price$11.24
Change+$0.11 (+0.99%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets312.99M
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$39.06
Change+$0.45 (+1.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.17B
LRSRX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LRSRX vs. SSGSX commentary
Apr 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LRSRX is a Hold and SSGSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.17B vs. LRSRX (313M). SSGSX pays higher dividends than LRSRX: SSGSX (0.52) vs LRSRX (0.00). LRSRX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: LRSRX (17 years) vs SSGSX (26 years). LRSRX (1.44) is less costly to investors than SSGSX (1.26). LRSRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 42.00 vs. SSGSX (37.00). LRSRX has a lower initial minimum investment than SSGSX: LRSRX (0) vs SSGSX (2500). SSGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -18.12 vs. LRSRX (-20.27). LRSRX return over 5 years is better than : 16.18 vs. SSGSX (13.51).
| LRSRX | SSGSX | LRSRX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.44 | 1.26 | 114% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.44 | 1.26 | 114% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -19.113 | -16.843 | 113% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 313M | 5.17B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.52 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -20.27 | -18.12 | 112% |
| Returns for 3 years | -14.58 | -17.94 | 81% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.18 | 13.51 | 120% |
| Returns for 10 years | -58.51 | -1.50 | 3,908% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...