Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LRSRX vs WCMFX
LRSRX vs WCMFX Comparison
Open Charts LRSRX vs WCMFX
Lord Abbett Small Cap Value R3
Price$12.95
Change+$0.04 (+0.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets346.9M
WCM SMID Quality Val Fd Institutional
Price$3.37
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.92M
LRSRX vs WCMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LRSRX vs. WCMFX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LRSRX is a Hold and WCMFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LRSRX has more cash in the bank: 347M vs. WCMFX (5.92M). LRSRX (0.00) and WCMFX (0.00) have matching dividends . LRSRX was incepted earlier than WCMFX: LRSRX (18 years) vs WCMFX (6 years). LRSRX (1.46) and WCMFX (1.45) have similar cost to investors . LRSRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 42.00 vs. WCMFX (15.00). LRSRX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMFX: LRSRX (0) vs WCMFX (100000). LRSRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -19.31 vs. WCMFX (-76.30). LRSRX return over 5 years is better than : 0.70 vs. WCMFX (-65.40).
| LRSRX | WCMFX | LRSRX / WCMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.46 | 0.90 | 162% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.46 | 1.45 | 101% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -6.177 | -71.870 | 9% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 347M | 5.92M | 5,862% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -19.31 | -76.30 | 25% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.78 | -67.31 | -10% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.70 | -65.40 | -1% |
| Returns for 10 years | -50.64 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement