Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LRSSX vs SSGSX
LRSSX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts LRSSX vs SSGSX
Lord Abbett Small Cap Value R4
Price$14.82
Change+$0.06 (+0.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets366.09M
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$44.25
Change+$0.13 (+0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.37B
LRSSX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LRSSX vs. SSGSX commentary
Aug 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LRSSX is a Buy and SSGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.37B vs. LRSSX (366M). SSGSX pays higher dividends than LRSSX: SSGSX (0.50) vs LRSSX (0.03). LRSSX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: LRSSX (10 years) vs SSGSX (26 years). SSGSX (1.26) and LRSSX (1.21) have similar cost to investors . LRSSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 42.00 vs. SSGSX (37.00). LRSSX has a lower initial minimum investment than SSGSX: LRSSX (0) vs SSGSX (2500). SSGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -5.54 vs. LRSSX (-6.08). LRSSX return over 5 years is better than : 21.91 vs. SSGSX (16.31).
| LRSSX | SSGSX | LRSSX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.21 | 1.26 | 96% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.21 | 1.26 | 96% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.655 | -4.975 | 73% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 366M | 5.37B | 7% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.03 | 0.50 | 5% |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.08 | -5.54 | 110% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.40 | -7.63 | -149% |
| Returns for 5 years | 21.91 | 16.31 | 134% |
| Returns for 10 years | -44.45 | 13.97 | -318% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement