Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LRSSX vs SSGSX
LRSSX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts LRSSX vs SSGSX
Lord Abbett Small Cap Value R4
Price$15.33
Change-$0.07 (-0.45%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets378.74M
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$46.93
Change-$0.05 (-0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.58B
LRSSX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LRSSX vs. SSGSX commentary
Sep 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LRSSX is a Buy and SSGSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.58B vs. LRSSX (379M). SSGSX pays higher dividends than LRSSX: SSGSX (0.47) vs LRSSX (0.03). LRSSX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: LRSSX (10 years) vs SSGSX (27 years). SSGSX (1.26) and LRSSX (1.21) have similar cost to investors . LRSSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 42.00 vs. SSGSX (37.00). LRSSX has a lower initial minimum investment than SSGSX: LRSSX (0) vs SSGSX (2500). SSGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -4.33 vs. LRSSX (-6.98). LRSSX return over 5 years is better than : 32.21 vs. SSGSX (27.16).
| LRSSX | SSGSX | LRSSX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.21 | 1.26 | 96% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.21 | 1.26 | 96% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.522 | 1.185 | 44% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 379M | 5.58B | 7% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.03 | 0.47 | 5% |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.98 | -4.33 | 161% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.73 | 3.52 | 617% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.21 | 27.16 | 119% |
| Returns for 10 years | -39.62 | 24.81 | -160% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement