Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LRSVX vs SSGSX
LRSVX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts LRSVX vs SSGSX
Lord Abbett Small Cap Value R6
Price$20.08
Change+$0.06 (+0.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets346.9M
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$44.46
Change+$0.08 (+0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.98B
LRSVX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LRSVX vs. SSGSX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LRSVX is a Hold and SSGSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 4.98B vs. LRSVX (347M). SSGSX pays higher dividends than LRSVX: SSGSX (0.49) vs LRSVX (0.20). LRSVX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: LRSVX (10 years) vs SSGSX (27 years). SSGSX (1.26) is less costly to investors than LRSVX (0.88). LRSVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 42.00 vs. SSGSX (37.00). LRSVX has a lower initial minimum investment than SSGSX: LRSVX (0) vs SSGSX (2500). SSGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -14.44 vs. LRSVX (-15.73). LRSVX return over 5 years is better than : 14.68 vs. SSGSX (2.06).
| LRSVX | SSGSX | LRSVX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 1.26 | 70% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 1.26 | 70% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.699 | -4.415 | 129% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 347M | 4.98B | 7% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.20 | 0.49 | 41% |
| Returns for 1 year | -15.73 | -14.44 | 109% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.22 | -10.47 | -136% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.68 | 2.06 | 711% |
| Returns for 10 years | -31.65 | 12.64 | -250% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement