LSBK
Price
$16.32
Change
+$0.32 (+2.00%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
65.94M
OPHC
Price
$4.49
Change
-$0.01 (-0.22%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
33.75M
79 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

LSBK vs OPHC

Header iconLSBK vs OPHC Comparison
Open Charts LSBK vs OPHCBanner chart's image
Lake Shore Ban
Price$16.32
Change+$0.32 (+2.00%)
Volume$1.68K
Capitalization65.94M
OptimumBank Holdings
Price$4.49
Change-$0.01 (-0.22%)
Volume$100.92K
Capitalization33.75M
LSBK vs OPHC Comparison Chart
Loading...
OPHC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LSBK vs. OPHC commentary
Feb 23, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LSBK is a Hold and OPHC is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 23, 2025
Stock price -- (LSBK: $16.32 vs. OPHC: $4.49)
Brand notoriety: LSBK and OPHC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LSBK: 57% vs. OPHC: 260%
Market capitalization -- LSBK: $65.94M vs. OPHC: $33.75M
LSBK [@Regional Banks] is valued at $65.94M. OPHC’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $33.75M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.88B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LSBK’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileOPHC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • LSBK’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • OPHC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, LSBK is a better buy in the long-term than OPHC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

OPHC’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • OPHC’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.

Price Growth

LSBK (@Regional Banks) experienced а +3.29% price change this week, while OPHC (@Regional Banks) price change was -4.97% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -1.09%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.76%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.90%.

Reported Earning Dates

LSBK is expected to report earnings on Jan 29, 2025.

OPHC is expected to report earnings on May 13, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-1.09% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LSBK($65.9M) has a higher market cap than OPHC($33.8M). LSBK has higher P/E ratio than OPHC: LSBK (14.18) vs OPHC (4.74). LSBK YTD gains are higher at: 20.138 vs. OPHC (-5.672). LSBK has less debt than OPHC: LSBK (35.2M) vs OPHC (64.2M). OPHC (27.2M) and LSBK (27M) have equivalent revenues.
LSBKOPHCLSBK / OPHC
Capitalization65.9M33.8M195%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD20.138-5.672-355%
P/E Ratio14.184.74299%
Revenue27M27.2M99%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt35.2M64.2M55%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LSBK vs OPHC: Fundamental Ratings
LSBK
OPHC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
967
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
66
Overvalued
5
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5061
SMR RATING
1..100
7144
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3858
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2391
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

OPHC's Valuation (5) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LSBK (66) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that OPHC’s stock grew somewhat faster than LSBK’s over the last 12 months.

LSBK's Profit vs Risk Rating (50) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as OPHC (61) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that LSBK’s stock grew similarly to OPHC’s over the last 12 months.

OPHC's SMR Rating (44) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as LSBK (71) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that OPHC’s stock grew similarly to LSBK’s over the last 12 months.

LSBK's Price Growth Rating (38) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as OPHC (58) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that LSBK’s stock grew similarly to OPHC’s over the last 12 months.

LSBK's P/E Growth Rating (23) in the Savings Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for OPHC (91) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that LSBK’s stock grew significantly faster than OPHC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
OPHC
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
74%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
OPHC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BINAX8.890.02
+0.23%
BlackRock Infrastructure Sust Opps Inv A
PNGYX14.10-0.12
-0.84%
Putnam International Value Y
ASYLX15.32-0.16
-1.03%
AB Select US Long/Short Advisor
JLVIX72.18-1.23
-1.68%
JHancock Fundamental Large Cap Core I
SGSCX29.64-0.59
-1.95%
DWS Global Small Cap S

LSBK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LSBK has been loosely correlated with MGYR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LSBK jumps, then MGYR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LSBK
1D Price
Change %
LSBK100%
+2.00%
MGYR - LSBK
34%
Loosely correlated
-0.03%
OPHC - LSBK
32%
Poorly correlated
-0.22%
CFBK - LSBK
30%
Poorly correlated
-2.39%
HBCP - LSBK
27%
Poorly correlated
-1.99%
AVAL - LSBK
25%
Poorly correlated
+0.65%
More

OPHC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that OPHC and LSBK have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that OPHC and LSBK's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OPHC
1D Price
Change %
OPHC100%
-0.22%
LSBK - OPHC
32%
Poorly correlated
+2.00%
BOH - OPHC
28%
Poorly correlated
-2.41%
PLBC - OPHC
27%
Poorly correlated
-1.58%
USCB - OPHC
27%
Poorly correlated
-1.30%
HBAN - OPHC
26%
Poorly correlated
-1.64%
More