Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LSCDX vs VFSTX
LSCDX vs VFSTX Comparison
Open Charts LSCDX vs VFSTX
Loomis Sayles Interm Duration Bond C
Price$9.54
Change-$0.03 (-0.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets232.16M
Vanguard Short-Term Investment-Grade I
Price$10.37
Change-$0.02 (-0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets52.45B
LSCDX vs VFSTX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LSCDX vs. VFSTX commentary
May 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LSCDX is a Hold and VFSTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VFSTX has more cash in the bank: 52.4B vs. LSCDX (232M). VFSTX pays higher dividends than LSCDX: VFSTX (4.23) vs LSCDX (3.22). LSCDX was incepted earlier than VFSTX: LSCDX (9 years) vs VFSTX (43 years). LSCDX (1.48) is less costly to investors than VFSTX (0.20). LSCDX has a lower initial minimum investment than VFSTX: LSCDX (2500) vs VFSTX (3000). LSCDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.95 vs. VFSTX (2.44). LSCDX return over 5 years is better than : -2.62 vs. VFSTX (-3.35).
| LSCDX | VFSTX | LSCDX / VFSTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.40 | 0.20 | 700% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 0.20 | 740% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 43 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.162 | 1.147 | 189% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 3000 | 83% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 232M | 52.4B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.22 | 4.23 | 76% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.95 | 2.44 | 203% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.76 | 2.64 | 257% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.62 | -3.35 | 78% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 5.71 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers