Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LSCDX vs VFSTX
LSCDX vs VFSTX Comparison
Open Charts LSCDX vs VFSTX
Loomis Sayles Interm Duration Bond C
Price$9.62
Change-$0.02 (-0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets237.03M
Vanguard Short-Term Investment-Grade I
Price$10.44
Change-$0.02 (-0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets52.46B
LSCDX vs VFSTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LSCDX vs. VFSTX commentary
Jul 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LSCDX is a Hold and VFSTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VFSTX has more cash in the bank: 52.5B vs. LSCDX (237M). VFSTX pays higher dividends than LSCDX: VFSTX (4.31) vs LSCDX (3.23). LSCDX was incepted earlier than VFSTX: LSCDX (9 years) vs VFSTX (43 years). LSCDX (1.48) is less costly to investors than VFSTX (0.20). LSCDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 132.00 vs. VFSTX (75.00). LSCDX has a lower initial minimum investment than VFSTX: LSCDX (2500) vs VFSTX (3000). LSCDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.28 vs. VFSTX (2.63). LSCDX return over 5 years is better than : -3.42 vs. VFSTX (-4.12).
| LSCDX | VFSTX | LSCDX / VFSTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.40 | 0.20 | 700% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 0.20 | 740% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 43 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.282 | 1.633 | 201% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 3000 | 83% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 237M | 52.5B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.23 | 4.31 | 75% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.28 | 2.63 | 201% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.33 | 3.74 | 223% |
| Returns for 5 years | -3.42 | -4.12 | 83% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 6.09 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers