Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LSCDX vs VFSTX
LSCDX vs VFSTX Comparison
Open Charts LSCDX vs VFSTX
Loomis Sayles Interm Duration Bond C
Price$9.67
Change-$0.01 (-0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets236.49M
Vanguard Short-Term Investment-Grade I
Price$10.49
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets52.72B
LSCDX vs VFSTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LSCDX vs. VFSTX commentary
Aug 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LSCDX is a Hold and VFSTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VFSTX has more cash in the bank: 52.7B vs. LSCDX (236M). VFSTX pays higher dividends than LSCDX: VFSTX (4.36) vs LSCDX (3.25). LSCDX was incepted earlier than VFSTX: LSCDX (9 years) vs VFSTX (43 years). LSCDX (1.48) is less costly to investors than VFSTX (0.20). LSCDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 132.00 vs. VFSTX (75.00). LSCDX has a lower initial minimum investment than VFSTX: LSCDX (2500) vs VFSTX (3000). LSCDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.52 vs. VFSTX (1.53). LSCDX return over 5 years is better than : -3.67 vs. VFSTX (-4.19).
| LSCDX | VFSTX | LSCDX / VFSTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.40 | 0.20 | 700% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 0.20 | 740% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 43 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.128 | 2.120 | 195% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 3000 | 83% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 236M | 52.7B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.25 | 4.36 | 74% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.52 | 1.53 | 230% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.31 | 4.03 | 231% |
| Returns for 5 years | -3.67 | -4.19 | 88% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 6.82 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement