Ad is loading...
LSCGX vs RPEBX
LSCGX vs RPEBX Comparison
Open Charts LSCGX vs RPEBX
Loomis Sayles Global Growth C
Price$20.41
Change+$0.09 (+0.44%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
American Funds New Perspective R2E
Price$65.85
Change-$0.16 (-0.24%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
LSCGX vs RPEBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LSCGX vs. RPEBX commentary
Dec 19, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LSCGX is a Buy and RPEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RPEBX has more cash in the bank: 149B vs. LSCGX (113M). RPEBX pays higher dividends than LSCGX: RPEBX (0.46) vs LSCGX (0.00). LSCGX was incepted earlier than RPEBX: LSCGX (9 years) vs RPEBX (10 years). LSCGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. RPEBX (17.00). RPEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than LSCGX: RPEBX (250) vs LSCGX (2500). LSCGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 30.42 vs. RPEBX (22.56). LSCGX return over 5 years is better than : 45.16 vs. RPEBX (38.90).
| LSCGX | RPEBX | LSCGX / RPEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 28.932 | 20.981 | 138% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 113M | 149B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.46 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 30.42 | 22.56 | 135% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.04 | 6.18 | 179% |
| Returns for 5 years | 45.16 | 38.90 | 116% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 71.21 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...