Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LSCGX vs RPEBX
LSCGX vs RPEBX Comparison
Open Charts LSCGX vs RPEBX
Loomis Sayles Global Growth C
Price$23.04
Change-$0.36 (-1.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets142.45M
American Funds New Perspective R2E
Price$70.37
Change-$0.66 (-0.93%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets162.17B
LSCGX vs RPEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LSCGX vs. RPEBX commentary
Sep 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LSCGX is a Hold and RPEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RPEBX has more cash in the bank: 162B vs. LSCGX (142M). RPEBX pays higher dividends than LSCGX: RPEBX (0.12) vs LSCGX (0.00). LSCGX was incepted earlier than RPEBX: LSCGX (9 years) vs RPEBX (11 years). LSCGX (2.13) is less costly to investors than RPEBX (1.21). RPEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. LSCGX (6.00). RPEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than LSCGX: RPEBX (250) vs LSCGX (2500). LSCGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 26.49 vs. RPEBX (10.95). LSCGX return over 5 years is better than : 41.73 vs. RPEBX (37.01).
| LSCGX | RPEBX | LSCGX / RPEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.95 | 1.21 | 161% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.13 | 1.21 | 176% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 21.875 | 16.565 | 132% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 142M | 162B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.12 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 26.49 | 10.95 | 242% |
| Returns for 3 years | 95.98 | 59.15 | 162% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.73 | 37.01 | 113% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 102.23 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement