Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LSCGX vs RPEBX
LSCGX vs RPEBX Comparison
Open Charts LSCGX vs RPEBX
Loomis Sayles Global Growth C
Price$22.26
Change-$0.19 (-0.85%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets135.51M
American Funds New Perspective R2E
Price$69.18
Change-$0.47 (-0.67%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets158.54B
LSCGX vs RPEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LSCGX vs. RPEBX commentary
Aug 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LSCGX is a Buy and RPEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RPEBX has more cash in the bank: 159B vs. LSCGX (136M). RPEBX pays higher dividends than LSCGX: RPEBX (0.12) vs LSCGX (0.00). LSCGX was incepted earlier than RPEBX: LSCGX (9 years) vs RPEBX (11 years). LSCGX (2.13) is less costly to investors than RPEBX (1.21). RPEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. LSCGX (6.00). RPEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than LSCGX: RPEBX (250) vs LSCGX (2500). LSCGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 26.48 vs. RPEBX (11.18). LSCGX (29.17) and RPEBX (27.94) have equivalent 5 years return.
| LSCGX | RPEBX | LSCGX / RPEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.95 | 1.21 | 161% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.13 | 1.21 | 176% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.927 | 14.593 | 116% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 136M | 159B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.12 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 26.48 | 11.18 | 237% |
| Returns for 3 years | 70.08 | 42.79 | 164% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.17 | 27.94 | 104% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 95.08 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement