Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LSCGX vs RPEBX
LSCGX vs RPEBX Comparison
Open Charts LSCGX vs RPEBX
Loomis Sayles Global Growth C
Price$21.73
Change+$0.02 (+0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets128.09M
American Funds New Perspective R2E
Price$70.03
Change-$0.07 (-0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets158.87B
LSCGX vs RPEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LSCGX vs. RPEBX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LSCGX is a Hold and RPEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RPEBX has more cash in the bank: 159B vs. LSCGX (128M). RPEBX pays higher dividends than LSCGX: RPEBX (0.11) vs LSCGX (0.00). LSCGX was incepted earlier than RPEBX: LSCGX (10 years) vs RPEBX (11 years). LSCGX (2.13) is less costly to investors than RPEBX (1.21). RPEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. LSCGX (6.00). RPEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than LSCGX: RPEBX (250) vs LSCGX (2500). LSCGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.89 vs. RPEBX (11.10). RPEBX return over 5 years is better than : 24.39 vs. LSCGX (20.39).
| LSCGX | RPEBX | LSCGX / RPEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.95 | 1.21 | 161% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.13 | 1.21 | 176% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.177 | 16.001 | 82% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 128M | 159B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.11 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.89 | 11.10 | 125% |
| Returns for 3 years | 68.97 | 44.58 | 155% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.39 | 24.39 | 84% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 81.14 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement