Ad is loading...
LSCGX vs RPEBX
LSCGX vs RPEBX Comparison
Open Charts LSCGX vs RPEBX
Loomis Sayles Global Growth C
Price$17.86
Change-$0.88 (-4.70%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets108.14M
American Funds New Perspective R2E
Price$57.43
Change-$2.38 (-3.98%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets139.04B
LSCGX vs RPEBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LSCGX vs. RPEBX commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LSCGX is a Hold and RPEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RPEBX has more cash in the bank: 139B vs. LSCGX (108M). RPEBX pays higher dividends than LSCGX: RPEBX (0.14) vs LSCGX (0.00). LSCGX was incepted earlier than RPEBX: LSCGX (9 years) vs RPEBX (11 years). LSCGX (2.14) is less costly to investors than RPEBX (1.21). RPEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. LSCGX (6.00). RPEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than LSCGX: RPEBX (250) vs LSCGX (2500). LSCGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.28 vs. RPEBX (1.77). RPEBX return over 5 years is better than : 65.32 vs. LSCGX (60.58).
| LSCGX | RPEBX | LSCGX / RPEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.96 | 1.21 | 162% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.14 | 1.21 | 177% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.396 | -0.928 | 258% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 108M | 139B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.14 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.28 | 1.77 | 638% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.18 | 1.30 | 1,241% |
| Returns for 5 years | 60.58 | 65.32 | 93% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 57.08 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...