LSDAF
Price
$126.27
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 4 closing price
MOJO
Price
$0.74
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 4 closing price
Ad is loading...

LSDAF vs MOJO

Header iconLSDAF vs MOJO Comparison
Open Charts LSDAF vs MOJOBanner chart's image
Lassonde Industries
Price$126.27
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$200
CapitalizationN/A
Equator Beverage
Price$0.74
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$14.28K
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
LSDAF vs MOJO Comparison Chart
Loading...
VS
LSDAF vs. MOJO commentary
Nov 06, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LSDAF is a Hold and MOJO is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 06, 2024
Stock price -- (LSDAF: $126.27 vs. MOJO: $0.74)
Brand notoriety: LSDAF and MOJO are both not notable
Both companies represent the Beverages: Non-Alcoholic industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LSDAF: 183% vs. MOJO: 178%
Market capitalization -- LSDAF: $769.76M vs. MOJO: $2.14M
LSDAF [@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic] is valued at $769.76M. MOJO’s [@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic] market capitalization is $2.14M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic] industry ranges from $263.76B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic] industry is $21.99B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LSDAF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMOJO’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • LSDAF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MOJO’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, LSDAF is a better buy in the long-term than MOJO.

Price Growth

LSDAF (@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while MOJO (@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic) price change was +5.83% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Beverages: Non-Alcoholic industry was +1.28%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.01%, and the average quarterly price growth was -2.19%.

Reported Earning Dates

MOJO is expected to report earnings on Apr 24, 2023.

Industries' Descriptions

@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic (+1.28% weekly)

Non-alcoholic drinks include traces of alcohol or low alcohol content or without alcohol or alcohol removed. Functional Beverages, Carbonated Soft Drinks (CSDs), Sports Drinks, Fruit Beverages, and Bottled Water are some common types of non-alcoholic beverages. The largest segment in this market is soft drinks (think Pepsi and Coke). Many established companies in this space have also been stepping up production of low to zero-calorie varieties in recent years, to cater to a rising number of health-conscious consumers. Coca-Cola Company, Pepsico Inc, Keurig Dr Pepper Inc. and Monster Beverage Corporation are some major non-alcoholic beverage makers.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LSDAF($770M) has a higher market cap than MOJO($2.14M). MOJO has higher P/E ratio than LSDAF: MOJO (64.52) vs LSDAF (13.58). LSDAF YTD gains are higher at: 22.793 vs. MOJO (15.781). LSDAF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 159M vs. MOJO (-107.24K). LSDAF has more cash in the bank: 338K vs. MOJO (24.7K). MOJO has less debt than LSDAF: MOJO (127K) vs LSDAF (251M). LSDAF has higher revenues than MOJO: LSDAF (2B) vs MOJO (1.9M).
LSDAFMOJOLSDAF / MOJO
Capitalization770M2.14M36,066%
EBITDA159M-107.24K-148,260%
Gain YTD22.79315.781144%
P/E Ratio13.5864.5221%
Revenue2B1.9M105,277%
Total Cash338K24.7K1,368%
Total Debt251M127K197,638%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LSDAF vs MOJO: Fundamental Ratings
LSDAF
MOJO
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3574
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
37
Fair valued
93
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10048
SMR RATING
1..100
6598
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4043
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7884
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LSDAF's Valuation (37) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MOJO (93). This means that LSDAF’s stock grew somewhat faster than MOJO’s over the last 12 months.

MOJO's Profit vs Risk Rating (48) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LSDAF (100). This means that MOJO’s stock grew somewhat faster than LSDAF’s over the last 12 months.

LSDAF's SMR Rating (65) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MOJO (98). This means that LSDAF’s stock grew somewhat faster than MOJO’s over the last 12 months.

LSDAF's Price Growth Rating (40) in the null industry is in the same range as MOJO (43). This means that LSDAF’s stock grew similarly to MOJO’s over the last 12 months.

LSDAF's P/E Growth Rating (78) in the null industry is in the same range as MOJO (84). This means that LSDAF’s stock grew similarly to MOJO’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MSGTX13.08N/A
N/A
Morgan Stanley Inst Glbl Infras C
ETTGX115.42-0.28
-0.24%
Eaton Vance Tx-Mgd Growth 1.1 A
JCAPX61.17-0.22
-0.36%
Janus Henderson Forty I
KLGIX50.52-0.19
-0.37%
NYLI WMC Growth Class I
TACLX19.97-0.08
-0.40%
Touchstone Large Cap A

LSDAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LSDAF and SHOT have been poorly correlated (+11% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LSDAF and SHOT's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LSDAF
1D Price
Change %
LSDAF100%
N/A
SHOT - LSDAF
11%
Poorly correlated
+2.88%
FQVTF - LSDAF
3%
Poorly correlated
-0.79%
UPCHY - LSDAF
2%
Poorly correlated
-5.95%
MOJO - LSDAF
2%
Poorly correlated
+2.92%
JSDA - LSDAF
1%
Poorly correlated
-9.23%
More

MOJO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MOJO and BRFH have been poorly correlated (+9% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MOJO and BRFH's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MOJO
1D Price
Change %
MOJO100%
+2.92%
BRFH - MOJO
9%
Poorly correlated
-1.58%
NNFSF - MOJO
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ZVIA - MOJO
5%
Poorly correlated
-6.03%
OTLY - MOJO
3%
Poorly correlated
+1.02%
LSDAF - MOJO
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More