LSDAF
Price
$153.61
Change
-$2.53 (-1.62%)
Updated
Aug 27 closing price
Capitalization
1.04B
UPCHY
Price
$116.84
Change
-$10.41 (-8.18%)
Updated
Jul 2 closing price
Capitalization
5.27B
Interact to see
Advertisement

LSDAF vs UPCHY

Header iconLSDAF vs UPCHY Comparison
Open Charts LSDAF vs UPCHYBanner chart's image
Lassonde Industries
Price$153.61
Change-$2.53 (-1.62%)
Volume$101
Capitalization1.04B
Uni-President China Holdings
Price$116.84
Change-$10.41 (-8.18%)
Volume$2
Capitalization5.27B
LSDAF vs UPCHY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
LSDAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
UPCHY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LSDAF vs. UPCHY commentary
Aug 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LSDAF is a Hold and UPCHY is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 28, 2025
Stock price -- (LSDAF: $153.61 vs. UPCHY: $116.84)
Brand notoriety: LSDAF and UPCHY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Beverages: Non-Alcoholic industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LSDAF: 2744% vs. UPCHY: 91%
Market capitalization -- LSDAF: $1.04B vs. UPCHY: $5.27B
LSDAF [@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic] is valued at $1.04B. UPCHY’s [@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic] market capitalization is $5.27B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic] industry ranges from $296.22B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic] industry is $20.84B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LSDAF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileUPCHY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • LSDAF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • UPCHY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, UPCHY is a better buy in the long-term than LSDAF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LSDAF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UPCHY’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LSDAF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • UPCHY’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LSDAF is a better buy in the short-term than UPCHY.

Price Growth

LSDAF (@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic) experienced а -1.62% price change this week, while UPCHY (@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Beverages: Non-Alcoholic industry was -0.79%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.45%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.97%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic (-0.79% weekly)

Non-alcoholic drinks include traces of alcohol or low alcohol content or without alcohol or alcohol removed. Functional Beverages, Carbonated Soft Drinks (CSDs), Sports Drinks, Fruit Beverages, and Bottled Water are some common types of non-alcoholic beverages. The largest segment in this market is soft drinks (think Pepsi and Coke). Many established companies in this space have also been stepping up production of low to zero-calorie varieties in recent years, to cater to a rising number of health-conscious consumers. Coca-Cola Company, Pepsico Inc, Keurig Dr Pepper Inc. and Monster Beverage Corporation are some major non-alcoholic beverage makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
UPCHY($5.27B) has a higher market cap than LSDAF($1.04B). UPCHY has higher P/E ratio than LSDAF: UPCHY (16.63) vs LSDAF (12.56). UPCHY (23.986) and LSDAF (23.292) have similar YTD gains . UPCHY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 3.62B vs. LSDAF (291M). UPCHY has higher revenues than LSDAF: UPCHY (30.3B) vs LSDAF (2.85B).
LSDAFUPCHYLSDAF / UPCHY
Capitalization1.04B5.27B20%
EBITDA291M3.62B8%
Gain YTD23.29223.98697%
P/E Ratio12.5616.6376%
Revenue2.85B30.3B9%
Total Cash33MN/A-
Total Debt651MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LSDAF vs UPCHY: Fundamental Ratings
LSDAF
UPCHY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
140
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
40
Fair valued
11
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6956
SMR RATING
1..100
6624
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5247
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3434
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
65n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

UPCHY's Valuation (11) in the null industry is in the same range as LSDAF (40). This means that UPCHY’s stock grew similarly to LSDAF’s over the last 12 months.

UPCHY's Profit vs Risk Rating (56) in the null industry is in the same range as LSDAF (69). This means that UPCHY’s stock grew similarly to LSDAF’s over the last 12 months.

UPCHY's SMR Rating (24) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LSDAF (66). This means that UPCHY’s stock grew somewhat faster than LSDAF’s over the last 12 months.

UPCHY's Price Growth Rating (47) in the null industry is in the same range as LSDAF (52). This means that UPCHY’s stock grew similarly to LSDAF’s over the last 12 months.

UPCHY's P/E Growth Rating (34) in the null industry is in the same range as LSDAF (34). This means that UPCHY’s stock grew similarly to LSDAF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LSDAFUPCHY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
30%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
40%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
40%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
46%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
45%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
32%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LSDAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
UPCHY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FEBIX14.990.03
+0.20%
First Eagle Global Income Builder I
HDRVX18.200.01
+0.05%
Janus Henderson International Div N
PCGRX25.19N/A
N/A
Victory Pioneer Mid Cap Value A
FTGQX29.48N/A
N/A
Templeton Growth C
GCEEX9.93N/A
N/A
Goldman Sachs Clean Energy Income R6

LSDAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LSDAF and SHOT have been poorly correlated (+11% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LSDAF and SHOT's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LSDAF
1D Price
Change %
LSDAF100%
-1.62%
SHOT - LSDAF
11%
Poorly correlated
-6.74%
FQVTF - LSDAF
3%
Poorly correlated
-1.03%
UPCHY - LSDAF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MOJO - LSDAF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
JSDA - LSDAF
1%
Poorly correlated
+3.18%
More

UPCHY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that UPCHY and YNAJF have been poorly correlated (+10% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that UPCHY and YNAJF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To UPCHY
1D Price
Change %
UPCHY100%
N/A
YNAJF - UPCHY
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FQVTF - UPCHY
5%
Poorly correlated
-1.03%
JSDA - UPCHY
4%
Poorly correlated
+3.18%
LSDAF - UPCHY
2%
Poorly correlated
-1.62%
YKLTY - UPCHY
1%
Poorly correlated
+1.02%
More