Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LSDAX vs MTLFX
LSDAX vs MTLFX Comparison
Open Charts LSDAX vs MTLFX
Lord Abbett Short Duration Tax Free A
Price$15.01
Change+$0.01 (+0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.59B
MFS Municipal Limited Maturity A
Price$7.92
Change+$0.01 (+0.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.67B
LSDAX vs MTLFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LSDAX vs. MTLFX commentary
May 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LSDAX is a Hold and MTLFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MTLFX has more cash in the bank: 2.67B vs. LSDAX (1.59B). MTLFX (2.98) and LSDAX (2.88) have matching dividends . LSDAX was incepted earlier than MTLFX: LSDAX (16 years) vs MTLFX (33 years). MTLFX (0.72) is less costly to investors than LSDAX (0.66). LSDAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 66.00 vs. MTLFX (30.00). MTLFX initial investment is less costly to investors than LSDAX (2%) vs LSDAX (2%). LSDAX (1000) and MTLFX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. MTLFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.66 vs. LSDAX (3.19). MTLFX return over 5 years is better than : 6.81 vs. LSDAX (5.30).
| LSDAX | MTLFX | LSDAX / MTLFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.59 | 110% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 0.72 | 92% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.553 | 0.643 | 86% |
| Front Load | 2% | 3% | 90% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.59B | 2.67B | 60% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.88 | 2.98 | 97% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.19 | 3.66 | 87% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.33 | 8.53 | 86% |
| Returns for 5 years | 5.30 | 6.81 | 78% |
| Returns for 10 years | 7.35 | 15.60 | 47% |