Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LSDCX vs MTLFX
LSDCX vs MTLFX Comparison
Open Charts LSDCX vs MTLFX
Lord Abbett Short Duration Tax Free C
Price$15.10
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.63B
MFS Municipal Limited Maturity A
Price$7.99
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.73B
LSDCX vs MTLFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LSDCX vs. MTLFX commentary
Jul 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LSDCX is a Hold and MTLFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MTLFX has more cash in the bank: 2.73B vs. LSDCX (1.63B). MTLFX pays higher dividends than LSDCX: MTLFX (3.00) vs LSDCX (2.23). LSDCX was incepted earlier than MTLFX: LSDCX (17 years) vs MTLFX (33 years). LSDCX (1.27) is less costly to investors than MTLFX (0.72). LSDCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 66.00 vs. MTLFX (30.00). LSDCX (1000) and MTLFX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. MTLFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.97 vs. LSDCX (2.67). MTLFX return over 5 years is better than : 6.79 vs. LSDCX (1.97).
| LSDCX | MTLFX | LSDCX / MTLFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.26 | 0.59 | 214% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.27 | 0.72 | 176% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.317 | 2.055 | 64% |
| Front Load | N/A | 3% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.63B | 2.73B | 60% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.23 | 3.00 | 74% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.67 | 3.97 | 67% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.67 | 8.68 | 65% |
| Returns for 5 years | 1.97 | 6.79 | 29% |
| Returns for 10 years | 3.90 | 17.08 | 23% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement