Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LSDCX vs MTLFX
LSDCX vs MTLFX Comparison
Open Charts LSDCX vs MTLFX
Lord Abbett Short Duration Tax Free C
Price$15.26
Change+$0.01 (+0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.67B
MFS Municipal Limited Maturity A
Price$8.11
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.86B
LSDCX vs MTLFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LSDCX vs. MTLFX commentary
Sep 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LSDCX is a Hold and MTLFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MTLFX has more cash in the bank: 2.86B vs. LSDCX (1.67B). MTLFX pays higher dividends than LSDCX: MTLFX (3.03) vs LSDCX (2.21). LSDCX was incepted earlier than MTLFX: LSDCX (17 years) vs MTLFX (34 years). LSDCX (1.27) is less costly to investors than MTLFX (0.72). LSDCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 66.00 vs. MTLFX (29.00). LSDCX (1000) and MTLFX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. MTLFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.12 vs. LSDCX (2.65). MTLFX return over 5 years is better than : 7.99 vs. LSDCX (2.83).
| LSDCX | MTLFX | LSDCX / MTLFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.26 | 0.59 | 214% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.27 | 0.72 | 176% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 34 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.689 | 4.138 | 65% |
| Front Load | N/A | 3% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.67B | 2.86B | 58% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.21 | 3.03 | 73% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.65 | 4.12 | 64% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.12 | 12.33 | 66% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.83 | 7.99 | 35% |
| Returns for 10 years | 5.31 | 19.32 | 27% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement