LSF
Price
$5.67
Change
+$0.02 (+0.35%)
Updated
Apr 25 closing price
Capitalization
24.95M
9 days until earnings call
NATR
Price
$11.46
Change
-$0.07 (-0.61%)
Updated
Apr 25 closing price
Capitalization
392.19M
8 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

LSF vs NATR

Header iconLSF vs NATR Comparison
Open Charts LSF vs NATRBanner chart's image
Laird Superfood
Price$5.67
Change+$0.02 (+0.35%)
Volume$28.35K
Capitalization24.95M
Nature's Sunshine Products
Price$11.46
Change-$0.07 (-0.61%)
Volume$60.94K
Capitalization392.19M
LSF vs NATR Comparison Chart
Loading...
LSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NATR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LSF vs. NATR commentary
Apr 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LSF is a Buy and NATR is a Buy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 28, 2025
Stock price -- (LSF: $5.67 vs. NATR: $11.46)
Brand notoriety: LSF and NATR are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food: Specialty/Candy industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LSF: 34% vs. NATR: 127%
Market capitalization -- LSF: $24.95M vs. NATR: $392.19M
LSF [@Food: Specialty/Candy] is valued at $24.95M. NATR’s [@Food: Specialty/Candy] market capitalization is $392.19M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry ranges from $327.81B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry is $9.28B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LSF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileNATR’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • LSF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • NATR’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both LSF and NATR are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LSF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NATR’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LSF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • NATR’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NATR is a better buy in the short-term than LSF.

Price Growth

LSF (@Food: Specialty/Candy) experienced а +7.59% price change this week, while NATR (@Food: Specialty/Candy) price change was -3.05% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Specialty/Candy industry was +0.39%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.57%, and the average quarterly price growth was -3.91%.

Reported Earning Dates

LSF is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2025.

NATR is expected to report earnings on Aug 07, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Specialty/Candy (+0.39% weekly)

A specialty/candy manufacturer specializes in one or more of the following: chocolate, candies, pasta, condiments, seasonings, among other items. Hershey Company, McCormick & Company and J.M. Smucker Company are some of the major firms in this segment. Demand for this industry’s products comes from both institutions/restaurants as well as households.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NATR($392M) has a higher market cap than LSF($24.9M). NATR YTD gains are higher at: -21.828 vs. LSF (-28.046). NATR has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 32.1M vs. LSF (-10.39M). NATR has more cash in the bank: 82.4M vs. LSF (7.57M). LSF has less debt than NATR: LSF (383K) vs NATR (14.9M). NATR has higher revenues than LSF: NATR (445M) vs LSF (34.2M).
LSFNATRLSF / NATR
Capitalization24.9M392M6%
EBITDA-10.39M32.1M-32%
Gain YTD-28.046-21.828128%
P/E RatioN/A27.06-
Revenue34.2M445M8%
Total Cash7.57M82.4M9%
Total Debt383K14.9M3%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NATR: Fundamental Ratings
NATR
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
60
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
50
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
71
SMR RATING
1..100
83
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
80
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
32
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LSFNATR
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
61%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
84%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
66%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
72%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
60%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
83%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
LSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NATR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ROG57.410.36
+0.63%
Rogers Corp
HTCR0.62N/A
+0.31%
Heartcore Enterprises
PRTH7.35N/A
N/A
Priority Technology Holdings
SLF58.33-0.02
-0.03%
Sun Life Financial
LNTH101.77-1.87
-1.80%
Lantheus Holdings

LSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LSF and NATR have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LSF and NATR's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LSF
1D Price
Change %
LSF100%
+0.35%
NATR - LSF
24%
Poorly correlated
-0.61%
FAMI - LSF
23%
Poorly correlated
-5.20%
KIKOF - LSF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FRPT - LSF
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.63%
PETZ - LSF
22%
Poorly correlated
-2.01%
More

NATR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NATR and CENTA have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NATR and CENTA's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NATR
1D Price
Change %
NATR100%
-0.61%
CENTA - NATR
29%
Poorly correlated
-1.62%
USNA - NATR
28%
Poorly correlated
+0.30%
BGS - NATR
28%
Poorly correlated
-0.44%
JBSS - NATR
28%
Poorly correlated
-1.02%
LANC - NATR
26%
Poorly correlated
-0.06%
More