LSF
Price
$4.97
Change
-$0.42 (-7.79%)
Updated
Apr 4, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
24.95M
34 days until earnings call
WHGLY
Price
$18.57
Change
-$0.05 (-0.27%)
Updated
Apr 3 closing price
Capitalization
6.94B
Ad is loading...

LSF vs WHGLY

Header iconLSF vs WHGLY Comparison
Open Charts LSF vs WHGLYBanner chart's image
Laird Superfood
Price$4.97
Change-$0.42 (-7.79%)
Volume$390
Capitalization24.95M
WH Group
Price$18.57
Change-$0.05 (-0.27%)
Volume$15.84K
Capitalization6.94B
LSF vs WHGLY Comparison Chart
Loading...
LSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WHGLY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LSF vs. WHGLY commentary
Apr 05, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LSF is a Hold and WHGLY is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 05, 2025
Stock price -- (LSF: $5.39 vs. WHGLY: $18.58)
Brand notoriety: LSF and WHGLY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food: Specialty/Candy industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LSF: 159% vs. WHGLY: 43%
Market capitalization -- LSF: $24.95M vs. WHGLY: $6.94B
LSF [@Food: Specialty/Candy] is valued at $24.95M. WHGLY’s [@Food: Specialty/Candy] market capitalization is $6.94B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry ranges from $327.81B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry is $9.28B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LSF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileWHGLY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • LSF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • WHGLY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, WHGLY is a better buy in the long-term than LSF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LSF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WHGLY’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LSF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • WHGLY’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LSF is a better buy in the short-term than WHGLY.

Price Growth

LSF (@Food: Specialty/Candy) experienced а -23.00% price change this week, while WHGLY (@Food: Specialty/Candy) price change was +3.77% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Specialty/Candy industry was -0.37%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.07%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.23%.

Reported Earning Dates

LSF is expected to report earnings on May 08, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Specialty/Candy (-0.37% weekly)

A specialty/candy manufacturer specializes in one or more of the following: chocolate, candies, pasta, condiments, seasonings, among other items. Hershey Company, McCormick & Company and J.M. Smucker Company are some of the major firms in this segment. Demand for this industry’s products comes from both institutions/restaurants as well as households.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WHGLY($6.94B) has a higher market cap than LSF($24.9M). WHGLY YTD gains are higher at: 27.731 vs. LSF (-31.599). WHGLY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 3.1B vs. LSF (-10.39M). WHGLY has more cash in the bank: 1.39B vs. LSF (7.57M). LSF has less debt than WHGLY: LSF (383K) vs WHGLY (3.9B). WHGLY has higher revenues than LSF: WHGLY (28.1B) vs LSF (34.2M).
LSFWHGLYLSF / WHGLY
Capitalization24.9M6.94B0%
EBITDA-10.39M3.1B-0%
Gain YTD-31.59927.731-114%
P/E RatioN/A4.96-
Revenue34.2M28.1B0%
Total Cash7.57M1.39B1%
Total Debt383K3.9B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
WHGLY: Fundamental Ratings
WHGLY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
14
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
56
SMR RATING
1..100
93
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
37
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
91
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LSFWHGLY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
62%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
60%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
LSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WHGLY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BIIB130.71-0.61
-0.46%
Biogen
FENG2.17-0.08
-3.36%
Phoenix New Media Limited
EXPO78.52-3.23
-3.95%
Exponent
ECPG33.54-2.05
-5.76%
Encore Capital Group
AMPX2.54-0.22
-7.97%
Amprius Technologies

LSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LSF and NATR have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LSF and NATR's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LSF
1D Price
Change %
LSF100%
-3.41%
NATR - LSF
24%
Poorly correlated
-2.58%
FAMI - LSF
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.59%
KIKOF - LSF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FRPT - LSF
22%
Poorly correlated
-5.28%
PETZ - LSF
22%
Poorly correlated
+1.80%
More

WHGLY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WHGLY has been loosely correlated with CIADY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 43% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if WHGLY jumps, then CIADY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WHGLY
1D Price
Change %
WHGLY100%
-0.30%
CIADY - WHGLY
43%
Loosely correlated
+0.22%
TYCMY - WHGLY
30%
Poorly correlated
+2.53%
ASBFY - WHGLY
21%
Poorly correlated
+2.27%
USNA - WHGLY
21%
Poorly correlated
-6.19%
LSF - WHGLY
20%
Poorly correlated
-3.41%
More