LSF
Price
$5.82
Change
-$0.11 (-1.85%)
Updated
Aug 29, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
61.75M
67 days until earnings call
WHGLY
Price
$21.30
Change
+$0.38 (+1.82%)
Updated
Aug 28 closing price
Capitalization
13.74B
Interact to see
Advertisement

LSF vs WHGLY

Header iconLSF vs WHGLY Comparison
Open Charts LSF vs WHGLYBanner chart's image
Laird Superfood
Price$5.82
Change-$0.11 (-1.85%)
Volume$250
Capitalization61.75M
WH Group
Price$21.30
Change+$0.38 (+1.82%)
Volume$84.58K
Capitalization13.74B
LSF vs WHGLY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
LSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WHGLY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LSF vs. WHGLY commentary
Aug 30, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LSF is a Hold and WHGLY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 30, 2025
Stock price -- (LSF: $5.79 vs. WHGLY: $21.31)
Brand notoriety: LSF and WHGLY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food: Major Diversified industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LSF: 70% vs. WHGLY: 223%
Market capitalization -- LSF: $61.75M vs. WHGLY: $13.74B
LSF [@Food: Major Diversified] is valued at $61.75M. WHGLY’s [@Food: Major Diversified] market capitalization is $13.74B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Major Diversified] industry ranges from $241.95B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Major Diversified] industry is $7.07B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LSF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileWHGLY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • LSF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • WHGLY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, WHGLY is a better buy in the long-term than LSF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LSF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WHGLY’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LSF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • WHGLY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both LSF and WHGLY are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

LSF (@Food: Major Diversified) experienced а -2.69% price change this week, while WHGLY (@Food: Major Diversified) price change was +2.64% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Major Diversified industry was +0.73%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.45%, and the average quarterly price growth was +885.68%.

Reported Earning Dates

LSF is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Major Diversified (+0.73% weekly)

Companies in this industry usually make a diverse range of agricultural and/or processed food. Some prominent names in this segment are Mondelez International, which makes chocolates, biscuits, cookies etc. The Kraft Heinz Company specializes in ketchups, sauces, fruit drink pouches and many more. General Mills, Inc. sells flour and cereal. Kellogg is famous for its snacks and breakfast cereal. And so on down the line. As more and more consumers are looking for healthier options in food in recent years, several legacy food companies have responded by revamping brands to include organic and no-added-sugar versions, and/or acquiring healthy food firms, and even streamlining operations.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WHGLY($13.7B) has a higher market cap than LSF($61.7M). WHGLY YTD gains are higher at: 54.720 vs. LSF (-26.523). WHGLY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 3.28B vs. LSF (-1.11M). WHGLY has more cash in the bank: 2.06B vs. LSF (3.93M). LSF has less debt than WHGLY: LSF (202K) vs WHGLY (3.72B). WHGLY has higher revenues than LSF: WHGLY (25.9B) vs LSF (47M).
LSFWHGLYLSF / WHGLY
Capitalization61.7M13.7B0%
EBITDA-1.11M3.28B-0%
Gain YTD-26.52354.720-48%
P/E RatioN/A8.56-
Revenue47M25.9B0%
Total Cash3.93M2.06B0%
Total Debt202K3.72B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
WHGLY: Fundamental Ratings
WHGLY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
68
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
3
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
36
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
41
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LSFWHGLY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
65%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WHGLY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FEAT34.440.19
+0.55%
YieldMax Dorsey Wright Fetrd 5 Inc ETF
DBND46.350.05
+0.11%
DoubleLine Opportunistic Core Bond ETF
MTUL36.49N/A
N/A
ETRACS 2x Lvrgd MSCI US Mntm Fctr TR ETN
MCN6.27N/A
N/A
Madison Covered Call & Equity Strategy Fund
DIVO43.60-0.05
-0.10%
Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF

WHGLY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WHGLY has been loosely correlated with CIADY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 43% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if WHGLY jumps, then CIADY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WHGLY
1D Price
Change %
WHGLY100%
+1.79%
CIADY - WHGLY
43%
Loosely correlated
-0.44%
TYCMY - WHGLY
30%
Poorly correlated
-3.63%
ASBFY - WHGLY
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.07%
USNA - WHGLY
21%
Poorly correlated
-2.27%
LSF - WHGLY
20%
Poorly correlated
+2.95%
More