Advertisement
LSF vs WHGLY
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LSF is a Buy and WHGLY is a Hold.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
LSF’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WHGLY’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- LSF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
- WHGLY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
Reported Earning Dates
LSF is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2025.
| LSF | WHGLY | LSF / WHGLY | |
| Capitalization | 63.8M | 13.3B | 0% |
| EBITDA | -1.04M | 3.28B | -0% |
| Gain YTD | -24.492 | 47.260 | -52% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | 8.27 | - |
| Revenue | 45M | 25.9B | 0% |
| Total Cash | 6.99M | 2.06B | 0% |
| Total Debt | 224K | 3.72B | 0% |
WHGLY | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 78 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 6 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 43 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 87 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 40 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 91 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| LSF | WHGLY | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 47% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 87% | 1 day ago 63% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 69% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 89% | 1 day ago 56% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 89% | 1 day ago 66% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 89% | 1 day ago 68% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 1 day ago 65% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 88% | 9 days ago 59% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 87% | 1 day ago 56% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 78% | 1 day ago 74% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| AUGU | 27.91 | 0.19 | +0.67% |
| AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 UncAugETF | |||
| BETH | 86.27 | 0.10 | +0.11% |
| ProShares Bitcoin&EtherMktCapWtdETF | |||
| VTES | 101.51 | N/A | N/A |
| Vanguard Short-Term Tax-Exmpt Bd ETF | |||
| BSMQ | 23.53 | -0.01 | -0.04% |
| Invesco BulletShares 2026 Muncpl Bd ETF | |||
| ENZL | 45.74 | -0.05 | -0.11% |
| iShares MSCI New Zealand ETF | |||
LSF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that LSF and STKL have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LSF and STKL's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LSF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LSF | 100% | -1.49% | ||
| STKL - LSF | 25% Poorly correlated | +4.51% | ||
| NATR - LSF | 24% Poorly correlated | +0.98% | ||
| FAMI - LSF | 23% Poorly correlated | +5.43% | ||
| WEST - LSF | 22% Poorly correlated | +4.95% | ||
| KIKOF - LSF | 22% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
WHGLY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WHGLY has been loosely correlated with CIADY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 43% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if WHGLY jumps, then CIADY could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To WHGLY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WHGLY | 100% | +0.97% | ||
| CIADY - WHGLY | 43% Loosely correlated | -0.99% | ||
| TYCMY - WHGLY | 30% Poorly correlated | -2.23% | ||
| ASBFY - WHGLY | 21% Poorly correlated | -0.33% | ||
| USNA - WHGLY | 21% Poorly correlated | -0.48% | ||
| LSF - WHGLY | 20% Poorly correlated | -1.49% | ||
More | ||||