LSFG
Price
$44.25
Change
-$5.75 (-11.50%)
Updated
Dec 12 closing price
MCHB
Price
$26500.00
Change
+$500.00 (+1.92%)
Updated
Oct 25 closing price
Ad is loading...

LSFG vs MCHB

Header iconLSFG vs MCHB Comparison
Open Charts LSFG vs MCHBBanner chart's image
Lifestore Financial Group
Price$44.25
Change-$5.75 (-11.50%)
Volume$2.1K
CapitalizationN/A
Mechanics Bank of Richmond (CA)
Price$26500.00
Change+$500.00 (+1.92%)
Volume$1
CapitalizationN/A
LSFG vs MCHB Comparison Chart
Loading...
LSFG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MCHB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LSFG vs. MCHB commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LSFG is a Hold and MCHB is a Buy.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (LSFG: $44.25 vs. MCHB: $26500.00)
Brand notoriety: LSFG and MCHB are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LSFG: 542% vs. MCHB: 57%
Market capitalization -- LSFG: $8.41M vs. MCHB: $1.49B
LSFG [@Regional Banks] is valued at $8.41M. MCHB’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $1.49B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.88B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LSFG’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMCHB’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • LSFG’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • MCHB’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both LSFG and MCHB are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LSFG’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MCHB’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LSFG’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • MCHB’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MCHB is a better buy in the short-term than LSFG.

Price Growth

LSFG (@Regional Banks) experienced а -11.50% price change this week, while MCHB (@Regional Banks) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -3.34%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.11%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.80%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-3.34% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCHB($1.49B) has a higher market cap than LSFG($8.41M). MCHB YTD gains are higher at: 17.180 vs. LSFG (5.745).
LSFGMCHBLSFG / MCHB
Capitalization8.41M1.49B1%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD5.74517.18033%
P/E RatioN/A6.88-
RevenueN/A692M-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total DebtN/A101M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LSFG vs MCHB: Fundamental Ratings
LSFG
MCHB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9049
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
29
Undervalued
27
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5050
SMR RATING
1..100
5412
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4551
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2446
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MCHB's Valuation (27) in the null industry is in the same range as LSFG (29). This means that MCHB’s stock grew similarly to LSFG’s over the last 12 months.

MCHB's Profit vs Risk Rating (50) in the null industry is in the same range as LSFG (50). This means that MCHB’s stock grew similarly to LSFG’s over the last 12 months.

MCHB's SMR Rating (12) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LSFG (54). This means that MCHB’s stock grew somewhat faster than LSFG’s over the last 12 months.

LSFG's Price Growth Rating (45) in the null industry is in the same range as MCHB (51). This means that LSFG’s stock grew similarly to MCHB’s over the last 12 months.

LSFG's P/E Growth Rating (24) in the null industry is in the same range as MCHB (46). This means that LSFG’s stock grew similarly to MCHB’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LSFGMCHB
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
11%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
20%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
18%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
19%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
17%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
15%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
28%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
23%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
19%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
20%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
34%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
30%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
LSFG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MCHB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MCISX14.78N/A
N/A
Victory Trivalent International Sm-Cp C
RKCIX10.49N/A
N/A
Rockefeller Climate Solutions Instl
MTRAX20.68-0.09
-0.43%
NYLI Income Builder Class A
GXXCX8.80-0.06
-0.68%
abrdn US Sustainable Leaders C
CAFEX41.70-2.79
-6.27%
American Funds AMCAP 529E

LSFG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LSFG and MCHB have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LSFG and MCHB's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LSFG
1D Price
Change %
LSFG100%
N/A
MCHB - LSFG
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BNKHF - LSFG
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MCHT - LSFG
25%
Poorly correlated
+2.27%
WCFB - LSFG
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
STBI - LSFG
22%
Poorly correlated
-1.02%
More

MCHB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MCHB has been loosely correlated with MDIBF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MCHB jumps, then MDIBF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MCHB
1D Price
Change %
MCHB100%
N/A
MDIBF - MCHB
38%
Loosely correlated
N/A
BLX - MCHB
28%
Poorly correlated
+1.16%
FBPA - MCHB
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LSFG - MCHB
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HCBC - MCHB
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More