LSFG
Price
$47.00
Change
-$1.50 (-3.09%)
Updated
Sep 24 closing price
Capitalization
48.43M
MCHB
Price
$13.29
Change
+$0.34 (+2.63%)
Updated
Oct 3 closing price
Capitalization
2.92B
29 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

LSFG vs MCHB

Header iconLSFG vs MCHB Comparison
Open Charts LSFG vs MCHBBanner chart's image
Lifestore Financial Group
Price$47.00
Change-$1.50 (-3.09%)
Volume$599
Capitalization48.43M
Mechanics Ban
Price$13.29
Change+$0.34 (+2.63%)
Volume$174.23K
Capitalization2.92B
LSFG vs MCHB Comparison Chart in %
LSFG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MCHB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LSFG vs. MCHB commentary
Oct 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LSFG is a Hold and MCHB is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 06, 2025
Stock price -- (LSFG: $46.35 vs. MCHB: $13.29)
Brand notoriety: LSFG and MCHB are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LSFG: 306% vs. MCHB: 113%
Market capitalization -- LSFG: $48.43M vs. MCHB: $2.92B
LSFG [@Regional Banks] is valued at $48.43M. MCHB’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $2.92B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $167.13B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.9B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LSFG’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMCHB’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • LSFG’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • MCHB’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, LSFG is a better buy in the long-term than MCHB.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LSFG’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MCHB’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LSFG’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • MCHB’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MCHB is a better buy in the short-term than LSFG.

Price Growth

LSFG (@Regional Banks) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while MCHB (@Regional Banks) price change was -4.46% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.44%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.68%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.54%.

Reported Earning Dates

MCHB is expected to report earnings on Nov 03, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.44% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCHB($2.92B) has a higher market cap than LSFG($48.4M). MCHB has higher P/E ratio than LSFG: MCHB (15.37) vs LSFG (9.65). LSFG YTD gains are higher at: 6.215 vs. MCHB (-99.950).
LSFGMCHBLSFG / MCHB
Capitalization48.4M2.92B2%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD6.215-99.950-6%
P/E Ratio9.6515.3763%
Revenue22.4MN/A-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt49.8MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LSFG vs MCHB: Fundamental Ratings
LSFG
MCHB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5094
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
38
Fair valued
64
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
20100
SMR RATING
1..100
6516
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5697
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3110
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a13

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LSFG's Valuation (38) in the null industry is in the same range as MCHB (64). This means that LSFG’s stock grew similarly to MCHB’s over the last 12 months.

LSFG's Profit vs Risk Rating (20) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for MCHB (100). This means that LSFG’s stock grew significantly faster than MCHB’s over the last 12 months.

MCHB's SMR Rating (16) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LSFG (65). This means that MCHB’s stock grew somewhat faster than LSFG’s over the last 12 months.

LSFG's Price Growth Rating (56) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MCHB (97). This means that LSFG’s stock grew somewhat faster than MCHB’s over the last 12 months.

MCHB's P/E Growth Rating (10) in the null industry is in the same range as LSFG (31). This means that MCHB’s stock grew similarly to LSFG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LSFGMCHB
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
11%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
29%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
9%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
13%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
22%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
19%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
10%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
10%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
13%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
86%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
50%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
23%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LSFG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MCHB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ASBFF26.66N/A
N/A
Associated British Foods plc
PGID0.01N/A
N/A
Peregrine Industries, Inc.
RCBC384.80N/A
N/A
River City Bank
WKCMF75.27N/A
N/A
Wacker Chemie AG
HAFG0.70N/A
N/A
Holistic Asset Finance Group Co., Ltd.

LSFG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LSFG and MCHB have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LSFG and MCHB's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LSFG
1D Price
Change %
LSFG100%
N/A
MCHB - LSFG
26%
Poorly correlated
+2.63%
BNKHF - LSFG
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MCHT - LSFG
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WCFB - LSFG
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
STBI - LSFG
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

MCHB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MCHB has been loosely correlated with MDIBF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MCHB jumps, then MDIBF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MCHB
1D Price
Change %
MCHB100%
+2.63%
MDIBF - MCHB
38%
Loosely correlated
N/A
BLX - MCHB
28%
Poorly correlated
+0.09%
FBPA - MCHB
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LSFG - MCHB
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HCBC - MCHB
26%
Poorly correlated
+1.57%
More