LSFG
Price
$45.14
Change
+$0.59 (+1.32%)
Updated
Jan 16 closing price
Capitalization
8.41M
MCHT
Price
$6.25
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jan 15 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
Ad is loading...

LSFG vs MCHT

Header iconLSFG vs MCHT Comparison
Open Charts LSFG vs MCHTBanner chart's image
Lifestore Financial Group
Price$45.14
Change+$0.59 (+1.32%)
Volume$200
Capitalization8.41M
Mauch Chunk Trust Financial
Price$6.25
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$100
CapitalizationN/A
LSFG vs MCHT Comparison Chart
Loading...
LSFG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MCHT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LSFG vs. MCHT commentary
Jan 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LSFG is a Hold and MCHT is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 19, 2025
Stock price -- (LSFG: $45.14 vs. MCHT: $6.25)
Brand notoriety: LSFG and MCHT are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LSFG: 20% vs. MCHT: 15%
Market capitalization -- LSFG: $8.41M vs. MCHT: $0
LSFG [@Regional Banks] is valued at $8.41M. MCHT’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.88B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LSFG’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMCHT’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • LSFG’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • MCHT’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, LSFG is a better buy in the long-term than MCHT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LSFG’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MCHT’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LSFG’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 0 bearish.
  • MCHT’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MCHT is a better buy in the short-term than LSFG.

Price Growth

LSFG (@Regional Banks) experienced а +2.01% price change this week, while MCHT (@Regional Banks) price change was +4.17% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +3.11%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.42%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.25%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+3.11% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LSFG YTD gains are higher at: 2.011 vs. MCHT (0.000).
LSFGMCHTLSFG / MCHT
Capitalization8.41MN/A-
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD2.0110.000-
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
RevenueN/AN/A-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total DebtN/AN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LSFG vs MCHT: Fundamental Ratings
LSFG
MCHT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
29
Undervalued
13
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
61100
SMR RATING
1..100
5530
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4578
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2367
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MCHT's Valuation (13) in the null industry is in the same range as LSFG (29). This means that MCHT’s stock grew similarly to LSFG’s over the last 12 months.

LSFG's Profit vs Risk Rating (61) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MCHT (100). This means that LSFG’s stock grew somewhat faster than MCHT’s over the last 12 months.

MCHT's SMR Rating (30) in the null industry is in the same range as LSFG (55). This means that MCHT’s stock grew similarly to LSFG’s over the last 12 months.

LSFG's Price Growth Rating (45) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MCHT (78). This means that LSFG’s stock grew somewhat faster than MCHT’s over the last 12 months.

LSFG's P/E Growth Rating (23) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MCHT (67). This means that LSFG’s stock grew somewhat faster than MCHT’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LSFGMCHT
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
27%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
50%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
14%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
55%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
39%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
18%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
35%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
17%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
26%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 20 days ago
50%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
71%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
33%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
LSFG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MCHT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
WMKGX23.340.24
+1.04%
WesMark Large Company Fund
BSPAX701.546.95
+1.00%
iShares S&P 500 Index Investor A
GGOSX10.310.09
+0.88%
Goldman Sachs Mid Cap Growth Svc
JHTAX19.530.16
+0.83%
JPMorgan Hedged Equity 3 A
EIPFX18.730.08
+0.43%
EIP Growth and Income Investor

LSFG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LSFG and MCHB have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LSFG and MCHB's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LSFG
1D Price
Change %
LSFG100%
N/A
MCHB - LSFG
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BNKHF - LSFG
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MCHT - LSFG
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WCFB - LSFG
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
STBI - LSFG
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

MCHT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MCHT and CTYP have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MCHT and CTYP's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MCHT
1D Price
Change %
MCHT100%
N/A
CTYP - MCHT
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RF - MCHT
27%
Poorly correlated
-1.31%
LSFG - MCHT
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FNBT - MCHT
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BKALF - MCHT
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More