Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LSFLX vs RWMHX
LSFLX vs RWMHX Comparison
Open Charts LSFLX vs RWMHX
Lord Abbett Focused Large Cap Value R4
Price$15.44
Change+$0.10 (+0.65%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets88.17M
American Funds Washington Mutual R5E
Price$68.26
Change+$0.54 (+0.80%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets210.62B
LSFLX vs RWMHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LSFLX vs. RWMHX commentary
Nov 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LSFLX is a StrongBuy and RWMHX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMHX has more cash in the bank: 211B vs. LSFLX (88.2M). RWMHX pays higher dividends than LSFLX: RWMHX (1.33) vs LSFLX (0.58). LSFLX was incepted earlier than RWMHX: LSFLX (6 years) vs RWMHX (10 years). LSFLX (1.64) is less costly to investors than RWMHX (0.41). LSFLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. RWMHX (29.00). LSFLX has a lower initial minimum investment than RWMHX: LSFLX (0) vs RWMHX (250). LSFLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.48 vs. RWMHX (5.26). RWMHX return over 5 years is better than : 45.74 vs. LSFLX (6.54).
| LSFLX | RWMHX | LSFLX / RWMHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 0.41 | 234% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.64 | 0.41 | 400% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.683 | 12.329 | 143% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 88.2M | 211B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.58 | 1.33 | 44% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.48 | 5.26 | 218% |
| Returns for 3 years | 54.76 | 31.19 | 176% |
| Returns for 5 years | 6.54 | 45.74 | 14% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 77.37 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement