Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LSHCX vs PEMGX
LSHCX vs PEMGX Comparison
Open Charts LSHCX vs PEMGX
Kinetics Spin-Off and Corp Rest Adv C
Price$25.31
Change-$0.31 (-1.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets30.19M
LSHCX vs PEMGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LSHCX vs. PEMGX commentary
Oct 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LSHCX is a Buy and PEMGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PEMGX has more cash in the bank: 33.1B vs. LSHCX (30.2M). LSHCX pays higher dividends than PEMGX: LSHCX (0.28) vs PEMGX (0.00). LSHCX was incepted earlier than PEMGX: LSHCX (18 years) vs PEMGX (20 years). LSHCX (2.56) is less costly to investors than PEMGX (0.91). PEMGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 10.50 vs. LSHCX (6.00). PEMGX has a lower initial minimum investment than LSHCX: PEMGX (1000) vs LSHCX (2500). PEMGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.13 vs. LSHCX (-7.32). LSHCX return over 5 years is better than : 184.08 vs. PEMGX (39.26).
| LSHCX | PEMGX | LSHCX / PEMGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.29 | 0.91 | 252% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.56 | 0.91 | 281% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -11.227 | 5.373 | -209% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 30.2M | 33.1B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.28 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.32 | 4.13 | -177% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.20 | 54.12 | 47% |
| Returns for 5 years | 184.08 | 39.26 | 469% |
| Returns for 10 years | 182.52 | 105.92 | 172% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement