Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LSHCX vs WWWFX
LSHCX vs WWWFX Comparison
Open Charts LSHCX vs WWWFX
Kinetics Spin-Off and Corp Rest Adv C
Price$28.91
Change+$0.36 (+1.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets35.36M
Kinetics Internet No Load
Price$109.63
Change-$1.15 (-1.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets349.22M
LSHCX vs WWWFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LSHCX vs. WWWFX commentary
Jun 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LSHCX is a StrongBuy and WWWFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WWWFX has more cash in the bank: 349M vs. LSHCX (35.4M). LSHCX pays higher dividends than WWWFX: LSHCX (0.24) vs WWWFX (0.19). LSHCX was incepted earlier than WWWFX: LSHCX (18 years) vs WWWFX (29 years). LSHCX (2.71) is less costly to investors than WWWFX (1.71). WWWFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 43.00 vs. LSHCX (6.00). LSHCX (2500) and WWWFX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. WWWFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 36.50 vs. LSHCX (30.02). WWWFX return over 5 years is better than : 214.63 vs. LSHCX (203.84).
| LSHCX | WWWFX | LSHCX / WWWFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.38 | 1.71 | 139% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.71 | 1.71 | 158% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.074 | 8.068 | -13% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 35.4M | 349M | 10% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.24 | 0.19 | 128% |
| Returns for 1 year | 30.02 | 36.50 | 82% |
| Returns for 3 years | 54.40 | 142.04 | 38% |
| Returns for 5 years | 203.84 | 214.63 | 95% |
| Returns for 10 years | 190.03 | 93.99 | 202% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement