Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LSHCX vs WWWFX
LSHCX vs WWWFX Comparison
Open Charts LSHCX vs WWWFX
Kinetics Spin-Off and Corp Rest Adv C
Price$33.82
Change-$0.42 (-1.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets42.86M
Kinetics Internet No Load
Price$116.21
Change+$0.46 (+0.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets367.06M
LSHCX vs WWWFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LSHCX vs. WWWFX commentary
May 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LSHCX is a Buy and WWWFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WWWFX has more cash in the bank: 367M vs. LSHCX (42.9M). LSHCX pays higher dividends than WWWFX: LSHCX (0.22) vs WWWFX (0.20). LSHCX was incepted earlier than WWWFX: LSHCX (18 years) vs WWWFX (29 years). LSHCX (2.71) is less costly to investors than WWWFX (1.71). WWWFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 43.00 vs. LSHCX (6.00). LSHCX (2500) and WWWFX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. LSHCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 81.40 vs. WWWFX (46.33). LSHCX return over 5 years is better than : 288.22 vs. WWWFX (235.79).
| LSHCX | WWWFX | LSHCX / WWWFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.38 | 1.71 | 139% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.71 | 1.71 | 158% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.642 | 12.916 | 144% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 42.9M | 367M | 12% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.22 | 0.20 | 112% |
| Returns for 1 year | 81.40 | 46.33 | 176% |
| Returns for 3 years | 102.17 | 146.35 | 70% |
| Returns for 5 years | 288.22 | 235.79 | 122% |
| Returns for 10 years | 242.98 | 100.80 | 241% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers