Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LSHCX vs WWWFX
LSHCX vs WWWFX Comparison
Open Charts LSHCX vs WWWFX
Kinetics Spin-Off and Corp Rest Adv C
Price$24.44
Change+$0.30 (+1.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets28.81M
Kinetics Internet No Load
Price$109.13
Change+$0.13 (+0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets341.61M
LSHCX vs WWWFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LSHCX vs. WWWFX commentary
Aug 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LSHCX is a StrongBuy and WWWFX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WWWFX has more cash in the bank: 342M vs. LSHCX (28.8M). LSHCX pays higher dividends than WWWFX: LSHCX (0.28) vs WWWFX (0.18). LSHCX was incepted earlier than WWWFX: LSHCX (18 years) vs WWWFX (29 years). LSHCX (2.56) is less costly to investors than WWWFX (1.71). WWWFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 43.00 vs. LSHCX (6.00). LSHCX (2500) and WWWFX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. WWWFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 38.74 vs. LSHCX (-3.25). WWWFX return over 5 years is better than : 186.21 vs. LSHCX (153.95).
| LSHCX | WWWFX | LSHCX / WWWFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.29 | 1.71 | 134% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.56 | 1.71 | 150% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -16.355 | 6.331 | -258% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 28.8M | 342M | 8% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.28 | 0.18 | 150% |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.25 | 38.74 | -8% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.66 | 137.95 | 14% |
| Returns for 5 years | 153.95 | 186.21 | 83% |
| Returns for 10 years | 173.09 | 107.72 | 161% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement