Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LSNGX vs RPEBX
LSNGX vs RPEBX Comparison
Open Charts LSNGX vs RPEBX
Loomis Sayles Global Growth N
Price$24.81
Change+$0.13 (+0.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets137.7M
American Funds New Perspective R2E
Price$69.33
Change+$0.47 (+0.68%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets158.47B
LSNGX vs RPEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LSNGX vs. RPEBX commentary
Sep 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LSNGX is a Buy and RPEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RPEBX has more cash in the bank: 158B vs. LSNGX (138M). RPEBX pays higher dividends than LSNGX: RPEBX (0.12) vs LSNGX (0.00). LSNGX was incepted earlier than RPEBX: LSNGX (8 years) vs RPEBX (11 years). RPEBX (1.21) is less costly to investors than LSNGX (1.06). RPEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. LSNGX (6.00). RPEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than LSNGX: RPEBX (250) vs LSNGX (1000000). LSNGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 30.03 vs. RPEBX (14.50). LSNGX return over 5 years is better than : 42.67 vs. RPEBX (32.38).
| LSNGX | RPEBX | LSNGX / RPEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 1.21 | 74% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 1.21 | 88% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.199 | 15.388 | 118% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 138M | 158B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.12 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 30.03 | 14.50 | 207% |
| Returns for 3 years | 81.09 | 47.01 | 173% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.67 | 32.38 | 132% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 91.19 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement