Ad is loading...
LSNGX vs RPEBX
LSNGX vs RPEBX Comparison
Open Charts LSNGX vs RPEBX
Loomis Sayles Global Growth N
Price$22.58
Change-$0.29 (-1.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets114.73M
American Funds New Perspective R2E
Price$63.11
Change-$0.77 (-1.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets147.51B
LSNGX vs RPEBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LSNGX vs. RPEBX commentary
Feb 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LSNGX is a Hold and RPEBX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RPEBX has more cash in the bank: 148B vs. LSNGX (115M). RPEBX pays higher dividends than LSNGX: RPEBX (0.46) vs LSNGX (0.00). LSNGX was incepted earlier than RPEBX: LSNGX (8 years) vs RPEBX (10 years). LSNGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. RPEBX (17.00). RPEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than LSNGX: RPEBX (250) vs LSNGX (1000000). LSNGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.72 vs. RPEBX (9.79). LSNGX return over 5 years is better than : 49.24 vs. RPEBX (31.20).
| LSNGX | RPEBX | LSNGX / RPEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.575 | 4.539 | 167% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 115M | 148B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.46 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 22.72 | 9.79 | 232% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.60 | 13.14 | 309% |
| Returns for 5 years | 49.24 | 31.20 | 158% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 67.02 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...