Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LSPCX vs MBXCX
LSPCX vs MBXCX Comparison
Open Charts LSPCX vs MBXCX
LoCorr Spectrum Income C
Price$5.61
Change+$0.01 (+0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets73.79M
Catalyst/Millburn Hedge Strategy C
Price$38.32
Change-$0.04 (-0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.34B
LSPCX vs MBXCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LSPCX vs. MBXCX commentary
Sep 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LSPCX is a Hold and MBXCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MBXCX has more cash in the bank: 8.34B vs. LSPCX (73.8M). LSPCX pays higher dividends than MBXCX: LSPCX (7.42) vs MBXCX (0.93). LSPCX was incepted earlier than MBXCX: LSPCX (12 years) vs MBXCX (10 years). LSPCX (4.64) is less costly to investors than MBXCX (3.03). LSPCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. MBXCX (48.00). LSPCX (2500) and MBXCX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. MBXCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.92 vs. LSPCX (5.11). LSPCX return over 5 years is better than : 49.35 vs. MBXCX (45.71).
| LSPCX | MBXCX | LSPCX / MBXCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 4.61 | 3.03 | 152% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 4.64 | 3.03 | 153% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.613 | 2.266 | 336% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 73.8M | 8.34B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 7.42 | 0.93 | 801% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.11 | 5.92 | 86% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.56 | 10.34 | 83% |
| Returns for 5 years | 49.35 | 45.71 | 108% |
| Returns for 10 years | 33.63 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement