Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LSPCX vs MBXCX
LSPCX vs MBXCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LSPCX vs. MBXCX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LSPCX is a Hold and MBXCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MBXCX has more cash in the bank: 8.19B vs. LSPCX (70.4M). LSPCX pays higher dividends than MBXCX: LSPCX (7.67) vs MBXCX (0.91). LSPCX was incepted earlier than MBXCX: LSPCX (12 years) vs MBXCX (10 years). LSPCX (4.64) is less costly to investors than MBXCX (3.03). LSPCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. MBXCX (19.00). LSPCX (2500) and MBXCX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. LSPCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.17 vs. MBXCX (-0.63). MBXCX return over 5 years is better than : 38.38 vs. LSPCX (33.49).
| LSPCX | MBXCX | LSPCX / MBXCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 4.61 | 3.03 | 152% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 4.64 | 3.03 | 153% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.457 | 0.560 | 1,153% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 70.4M | 8.19B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 7.67 | 0.91 | 838% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.17 | -0.63 | -657% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.48 | 8.09 | 179% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.49 | 38.38 | 87% |
| Returns for 10 years | 34.13 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement