Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LSRCX vs SSGSX
LSRCX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts LSRCX vs SSGSX
Lord Abbett Small Cap Value C
Price$1.73
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets355.33M
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$42.44
Change-$0.09 (-0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.56B
LSRCX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LSRCX vs. SSGSX commentary
Jun 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LSRCX is a Buy and SSGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.57B vs. LSRCX (355M). SSGSX pays higher dividends than LSRCX: SSGSX (0.52) vs LSRCX (0.22). LSRCX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: LSRCX (28 years) vs SSGSX (26 years). LSRCX (1.96) is less costly to investors than SSGSX (1.26). LSRCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 42.00 vs. SSGSX (37.00). LSRCX has a lower initial minimum investment than SSGSX: LSRCX (1000) vs SSGSX (2500). SSGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -9.66 vs. LSRCX (-47.15). SSGSX return over 5 years is better than : 9.02 vs. LSRCX (-62.37).
| LSRCX | SSGSX | LSRCX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.96 | 1.26 | 156% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.96 | 1.26 | 156% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -8.947 | -8.400 | 107% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 355M | 5.57B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.22 | 0.52 | 42% |
| Returns for 1 year | -47.15 | -9.66 | 488% |
| Returns for 3 years | -48.65 | -12.21 | 398% |
| Returns for 5 years | -62.37 | 9.02 | -691% |
| Returns for 10 years | -91.37 | 8.85 | -1,032% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement