Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LSRCX vs SSGSX
LSRCX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts LSRCX vs SSGSX
Lord Abbett Small Cap Value C
Price$1.78
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets347.96M
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$44.37
Change-$0.09 (-0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.96B
LSRCX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LSRCX vs. SSGSX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LSRCX is a Hold and SSGSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 4.96B vs. LSRCX (348M). SSGSX pays higher dividends than LSRCX: SSGSX (0.49) vs LSRCX (0.21). LSRCX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: LSRCX (29 years) vs SSGSX (27 years). LSRCX (1.96) is less costly to investors than SSGSX (1.26). LSRCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 42.00 vs. SSGSX (37.00). LSRCX has a lower initial minimum investment than SSGSX: LSRCX (1000) vs SSGSX (2500). SSGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -13.94 vs. LSRCX (-51.53). SSGSX return over 5 years is better than : 2.50 vs. LSRCX (-64.28).
| LSRCX | SSGSX | LSRCX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.96 | 1.26 | 156% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.96 | 1.26 | 156% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -6.316 | -4.243 | 149% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 348M | 4.96B | 7% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.21 | 0.49 | 43% |
| Returns for 1 year | -51.53 | -13.94 | 370% |
| Returns for 3 years | -44.04 | -10.31 | 427% |
| Returns for 5 years | -64.28 | 2.50 | -2,567% |
| Returns for 10 years | -90.95 | 12.84 | -708% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement