Ad is loading...
LSRCX vs SSGSX
LSRCX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts LSRCX vs SSGSX
Lord Abbett Small Cap Value C
Price$1.60
Change+$0.03 (+1.91%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets324.09M
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$40.06
Change+$0.33 (+0.83%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.29B
LSRCX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LSRCX vs. SSGSX commentary
Apr 24, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LSRCX is a Buy and SSGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.29B vs. LSRCX (324M). SSGSX pays higher dividends than LSRCX: SSGSX (0.52) vs LSRCX (0.22). LSRCX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: LSRCX (28 years) vs SSGSX (26 years). LSRCX (1.94) is less costly to investors than SSGSX (1.26). LSRCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 42.00 vs. SSGSX (37.00). LSRCX has a lower initial minimum investment than SSGSX: LSRCX (1000) vs SSGSX (2500). SSGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -15.28 vs. LSRCX (-50.53). SSGSX return over 5 years is better than : 22.94 vs. LSRCX (-55.86).
| LSRCX | SSGSX | LSRCX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.94 | 1.26 | 154% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.94 | 1.26 | 154% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -17.368 | -14.430 | 120% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 324M | 5.29B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.22 | 0.52 | 42% |
| Returns for 1 year | -50.53 | -15.28 | 331% |
| Returns for 3 years | -53.95 | -16.96 | 318% |
| Returns for 5 years | -55.86 | 22.94 | -243% |
| Returns for 10 years | -92.26 | 1.36 | -6,783% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers