Ad is loading...
LSRCX vs SSGSX
LSRCX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts LSRCX vs SSGSX
Lord Abbett Small Cap Value C
Price$1.61
Change-$0.15 (-8.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets358.36M
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$40.36
Change-$3.24 (-7.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.88B
LSRCX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LSRCX vs. SSGSX commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LSRCX is a StrongBuy and SSGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.88B vs. LSRCX (358M). SSGSX pays higher dividends than LSRCX: SSGSX (0.52) vs LSRCX (0.22). LSRCX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: LSRCX (28 years) vs SSGSX (26 years). LSRCX (1.94) is less costly to investors than SSGSX (1.26). LSRCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 42.00 vs. SSGSX (37.00). LSRCX has a lower initial minimum investment than SSGSX: LSRCX (1000) vs SSGSX (2500). SSGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -9.24 vs. LSRCX (-45.90). SSGSX return over 5 years is better than : 51.13 vs. LSRCX (-43.24).
| LSRCX | SSGSX | LSRCX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.94 | 1.26 | 154% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.94 | 1.26 | 154% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -7.368 | -6.095 | 121% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 358M | 5.88B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.22 | 0.52 | 42% |
| Returns for 1 year | -45.90 | -9.24 | 497% |
| Returns for 3 years | -50.67 | -10.59 | 479% |
| Returns for 5 years | -43.24 | 51.13 | -85% |
| Returns for 10 years | -91.36 | 10.74 | -851% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...