Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LSSNX vs WCMLX
LSSNX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts LSSNX vs WCMLX
Loomis Sayles Small Cap Growth N
Price$29.58
Change+$0.56 (+1.93%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.13B
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$12.89
Change+$0.18 (+1.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets42.87M
LSSNX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LSSNX vs. WCMLX commentary
Jul 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LSSNX is a Buy and WCMLX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LSSNX has more cash in the bank: 2.13B vs. WCMLX (42.9M). LSSNX (0.00) and WCMLX (0.00) have matching dividends . LSSNX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: LSSNX (12 years) vs WCMLX (6 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than LSSNX (0.83). WCMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. LSSNX (39.00). WCMLX has a lower initial minimum investment than LSSNX: WCMLX (100000) vs LSSNX (1000000). WCMLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.08 vs. LSSNX (2.33). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : 22.57 vs. LSSNX (8.41).
| LSSNX | WCMLX | LSSNX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 0.99 | 84% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 1.79 | 46% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.225 | -1.166 | 191% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 100000 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.13B | 42.9M | 4,960% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.33 | 3.08 | 76% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.23 | 20.02 | 101% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.41 | 22.57 | 37% |
| Returns for 10 years | 14.53 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers