Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LSSNX vs WCMLX
LSSNX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts LSSNX vs WCMLX
Loomis Sayles Small Cap Growth N
Price$29.79
Change+$0.04 (+0.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.1B
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$13.15
Change+$0.06 (+0.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.26M
LSSNX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LSSNX vs. WCMLX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LSSNX is a Hold and WCMLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LSSNX has more cash in the bank: 2.11B vs. WCMLX (41.3M). LSSNX (0.00) and WCMLX (0.00) have matching dividends . LSSNX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: LSSNX (13 years) vs WCMLX (6 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than LSSNX (0.83). WCMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. LSSNX (39.00). WCMLX has a lower initial minimum investment than LSSNX: WCMLX (100000) vs LSSNX (1000000). WCMLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -3.04 vs. LSSNX (-5.88). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : -0.83 vs. LSSNX (-8.65).
| LSSNX | WCMLX | LSSNX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 0.99 | 84% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 1.79 | 46% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.438 | 1.788 | 25% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 100000 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.11B | 41.3M | 5,097% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.88 | -3.04 | 194% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.82 | 21.43 | 74% |
| Returns for 5 years | -8.65 | -0.83 | 1,038% |
| Returns for 10 years | 25.48 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement