Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LSVQX vs SSGSX
LSVQX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts LSVQX vs SSGSX
LSV Small Cap Value Institutional
Price$18.79
Change+$0.19 (+1.02%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets575.49M
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$44.98
Change+$0.52 (+1.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.66B
LSVQX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LSVQX vs. SSGSX commentary
Jul 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LSVQX is a Buy and SSGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.66B vs. LSVQX (575M). LSVQX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: LSVQX (1.77) vs SSGSX (0.51). LSVQX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: LSVQX (12 years) vs SSGSX (26 years). SSGSX (1.26) is less costly to investors than LSVQX (0.85). SSGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. LSVQX (25.00). SSGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than LSVQX: SSGSX (2500) vs LSVQX (100000). LSVQX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -3.38 vs. SSGSX (-11.31). LSVQX return over 5 years is better than : 104.83 vs. SSGSX (21.70).
| LSVQX | SSGSX | LSVQX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 1.26 | 67% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 1.26 | 67% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.162 | -4.243 | -4% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 2500 | 4,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 575M | 5.66B | 10% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.77 | 0.51 | 350% |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.38 | -11.31 | 30% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.76 | 1.30 | 2,289% |
| Returns for 5 years | 104.83 | 21.70 | 483% |
| Returns for 10 years | 64.64 | 14.39 | 449% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement