Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LTBYX vs SFCNX
LTBYX vs SFCNX Comparison
Open Charts LTBYX vs SFCNX
Invesco Rochester® Limited Tm NY Mncpl Y
Price$2.79
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.43B
Allspring California Ltd-Trm Tx-FrInst
Price$10.16
Change+$0.01 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets336.39M
LTBYX vs SFCNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LTBYX vs. SFCNX commentary
Oct 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LTBYX is a Hold and SFCNX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LTBYX has more cash in the bank: 1.43B vs. SFCNX (336M). LTBYX pays higher dividends than SFCNX: LTBYX (3.71) vs SFCNX (2.46). LTBYX was incepted earlier than SFCNX: LTBYX (15 years) vs SFCNX (11 years). LTBYX (0.58) is less costly to investors than SFCNX (0.54). LTBYX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 26.00 vs. SFCNX (24.00). LTBYX has a lower initial minimum investment than SFCNX: LTBYX (1000) vs SFCNX (1000000). SFCNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.54 vs. LTBYX (2.38). LTBYX return over 5 years is better than : 8.58 vs. SFCNX (6.04).
| LTBYX | SFCNX | LTBYX / SFCNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 0.50 | 116% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 0.54 | 107% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.528 | 3.737 | 68% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.43B | 336M | 425% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.71 | 2.46 | 151% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.38 | 3.54 | 67% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.75 | 12.28 | 104% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.58 | 6.04 | 142% |
| Returns for 10 years | 24.16 | 10.17 | 238% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement