Advertisement
LTC vs PHPRF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LTC is a Hold and PHPRF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
LTC’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whilePHPRF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- LTC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- PHPRF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
LTC’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PHPRF’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).
- LTC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
- PHPRF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 0 bearish.
Price Growth
LTC (@Managed Health Care) experienced а +2.74% price change this week, while PHPRF (@Managed Health Care) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Managed Health Care industry was +1.15%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.76%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.82%.
Reported Earning Dates
LTC is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Managed Health Care (+1.15% weekly)Managed healthcare industry focuses on providing health/medical and disability insurance plans, generally intended to reduce the cost of for-profit health care. The insurance products might be provided through employer-paid (fully or partly) insurance and benefit programs, or through Medicare/Medicaid. Some of the largest providers of managed health care include Aetna, Humana Inc., and Cigna, and UnitedHealthcare.
| LTC | PHPRF | LTC / PHPRF | |
| Capitalization | 1.62B | 3.24B | 50% |
| EBITDA | 160M | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.008 | 4.202 | 167% |
| P/E Ratio | 19.46 | 12.85 | 151% |
| Revenue | 218M | 147M | 148% |
| Total Cash | N/A | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 696M | 1.4B | 50% |
LTC | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 74 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 3 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 46 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 75 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 56 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 26 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| LTC | PHPRF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 67% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 54% | N/A |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 38% | 5 days ago 17% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 42% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 49% | 3 days ago 13% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 39% | 3 days ago 14% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 48% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 42% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 50% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 42% | N/A |
Advertisement
LTC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LTC has been closely correlated with NHI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LTC jumps, then NHI could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LTC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LTC | 100% | +1.73% | ||
| NHI - LTC | 77% Closely correlated | +2.49% | ||
| SBRA - LTC | 70% Closely correlated | +1.85% | ||
| WELL - LTC | 62% Loosely correlated | +1.75% | ||
| OHI - LTC | 61% Loosely correlated | +1.73% | ||
| KIM - LTC | 60% Loosely correlated | +1.06% | ||
More | ||||
PHPRF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that PHPRF and LTC have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PHPRF and LTC's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PHPRF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PHPRF | 100% | N/A | ||
| LTC - PHPRF | 26% Poorly correlated | +1.73% | ||
| WELL - PHPRF | 26% Poorly correlated | +1.75% | ||
| SILA - PHPRF | 0% Poorly correlated | +0.55% | ||
| JRHIF - PHPRF | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| CBAOF - PHPRF | -0% Poorly correlated | N/A |