Advertisement
LTCH vs SEAC
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LTCH is a Buy and SEAC is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
LTCH’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSEAC’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- LTCH’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- SEAC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Price Growth
LTCH (@Packaged Software) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while SEAC (@Packaged Software) price change was -16.03% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -1.68%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.38%, and the average quarterly price growth was +43.51%.
Reported Earning Dates
LTCH is expected to report earnings on Aug 15, 2025.
SEAC is expected to report earnings on Jun 07, 2023.
Industries' Descriptions
@Packaged Software (-1.68% weekly)Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
| LTCH | SEAC | LTCH / SEAC | |
| Capitalization | 144M | 12.6M | 1,143% |
| EBITDA | -153.04M | 626K | -24,448% |
| Gain YTD | 0.000 | -25.077 | - |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | 0.58 | - |
| Revenue | 48.4M | 32.8M | 148% |
| Total Cash | 264M | 15.2M | 1,737% |
| Total Debt | N/A | 1.22M | - |
SEAC | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 41 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 92 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 86 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 62 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| RSI ODDS (%) |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) |
| Momentum ODDS (%) |
| MACD ODDS (%) |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) |
| Advances ODDS (%) |
| Declines ODDS (%) |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) |
| Aroon ODDS (%) |
Advertisement
LTCH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LTCH has been loosely correlated with MLNK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LTCH jumps, then MLNK could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LTCH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LTCH | 100% | N/A | ||
| MLNK - LTCH | 42% Loosely correlated | -7.13% | ||
| RIOT - LTCH | 42% Loosely correlated | -4.80% | ||
| CLSK - LTCH | 41% Loosely correlated | -4.22% | ||
| COIN - LTCH | 39% Loosely correlated | +0.69% | ||
| AVPT - LTCH | 38% Loosely correlated | -1.95% | ||
More | ||||
SEAC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SEAC has been loosely correlated with PUBM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SEAC jumps, then PUBM could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SEAC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SEAC | 100% | N/A | ||
| PUBM - SEAC | 44% Loosely correlated | -4.29% | ||
| TDC - SEAC | 43% Loosely correlated | -3.33% | ||
| SOPA - SEAC | 35% Loosely correlated | -6.38% | ||
| DDOG - SEAC | 34% Loosely correlated | -1.82% | ||
| LTCH - SEAC | 33% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||