Ad is loading...
LTFOX vs RMEBX
LTFOX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts LTFOX vs RMEBX
Lord Abbett Affiliated F3
Price$18.76
Change-$0.40 (-2.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.03B
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$56.07
Change-$0.84 (-1.48%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets104.15B
LTFOX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LTFOX vs. RMEBX commentary
Mar 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LTFOX is a StrongBuy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 104B vs. LTFOX (6.03B). LTFOX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: LTFOX (1.79) vs RMEBX (1.15). LTFOX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: LTFOX (8 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than LTFOX (0.39). LTFOX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). LTFOX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMEBX: LTFOX (0) vs RMEBX (250). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.24 vs. LTFOX (6.47). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 52.38 vs. LTFOX (46.26).
| LTFOX | RMEBX | LTFOX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.39 | 1.07 | 36% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.39 | 1.07 | 36% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.537 | 3.661 | 42% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.03B | 104B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.79 | 1.15 | 156% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.47 | 8.24 | 79% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.74 | 18.60 | 95% |
| Returns for 5 years | 46.26 | 52.38 | 88% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 67.56 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...