Ad is loading...
LTFOX vs RMEBX
LTFOX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts LTFOX vs RMEBX
Lord Abbett Affiliated F3
Price$18.18
Change+$1.19 (+7.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.69B
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$53.86
Change+$3.35 (+6.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets98.3B
LTFOX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LTFOX vs. RMEBX commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LTFOX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 98.3B vs. LTFOX (5.69B). LTFOX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: LTFOX (1.84) vs RMEBX (1.18). LTFOX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: LTFOX (8 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than LTFOX (0.39). LTFOX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). LTFOX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMEBX: LTFOX (0) vs RMEBX (250). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -4.56 vs. LTFOX (-6.85). LTFOX (44.79) and RMEBX (44.36) have equivalent 5 years return.
| LTFOX | RMEBX | LTFOX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.39 | 1.07 | 36% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.39 | 1.07 | 36% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -9.624 | -7.747 | 124% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.69B | 98.3B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.84 | 1.18 | 156% |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.85 | -4.56 | 150% |
| Returns for 3 years | -1.10 | -1.07 | 102% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.79 | 44.36 | 101% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 44.99 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...