Ad is loading...
LTFOX vs RMEBX
LTFOX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts LTFOX vs RMEBX
Lord Abbett Affiliated F3
Price$19.71
Change-$0.32 (-1.60%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.23B
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$57.54
Change-$0.62 (-1.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets105.48B
LTFOX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LTFOX vs. RMEBX commentary
Feb 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LTFOX is a StrongBuy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 105B vs. LTFOX (6.23B). LTFOX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: LTFOX (1.70) vs RMEBX (1.54). LTFOX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: LTFOX (8 years) vs RMEBX (10 years). LTFOX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. RMEBX (25.00). LTFOX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMEBX: LTFOX (0) vs RMEBX (250). LTFOX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.78 vs. RMEBX (10.88). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 40.75 vs. LTFOX (33.65).
| LTFOX | RMEBX | LTFOX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.147 | 4.809 | 128% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.23B | 105B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.70 | 1.54 | 110% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.78 | 10.88 | 127% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.59 | 19.18 | 107% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.65 | 40.75 | 83% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 63.29 | - |