Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LTFOX vs RMEBX
LTFOX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts LTFOX vs RMEBX
Lord Abbett Affiliated F3
Price$21.14
Change+$0.02 (+0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.4B
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$62.55
Change+$0.10 (+0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets112.47B
LTFOX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LTFOX vs. RMEBX commentary
Oct 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LTFOX is a Hold and RMEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 112B vs. LTFOX (6.4B). LTFOX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: LTFOX (1.56) vs RMEBX (1.05). LTFOX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: LTFOX (9 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than LTFOX (0.39). LTFOX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). LTFOX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMEBX: LTFOX (0) vs RMEBX (250). LTFOX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.38 vs. RMEBX (7.29). LTFOX (60.96) and RMEBX (59.63) have equivalent 5 years return.
| LTFOX | RMEBX | LTFOX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.39 | 1.07 | 36% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.39 | 1.07 | 36% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.109 | 14.812 | 89% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.4B | 112B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.56 | 1.05 | 148% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.38 | 7.29 | 115% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.60 | 43.24 | 105% |
| Returns for 5 years | 60.96 | 59.63 | 102% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 92.37 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement