Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LTFOX vs RMEBX
LTFOX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts LTFOX vs RMEBX
Lord Abbett Affiliated F3
Price$20.00
Change-$0.07 (-0.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.16B
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$59.77
Change+$0.03 (+0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets108.83B
LTFOX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LTFOX vs. RMEBX commentary
Jul 22, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LTFOX is a StrongBuy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 109B vs. LTFOX (6.16B). LTFOX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: LTFOX (1.67) vs RMEBX (1.12). LTFOX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: LTFOX (8 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than LTFOX (0.39). LTFOX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). LTFOX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMEBX: LTFOX (0) vs RMEBX (250). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.38 vs. LTFOX (8.46). LTFOX (55.90) and RMEBX (54.66) have equivalent 5 years return.
| LTFOX | RMEBX | LTFOX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.39 | 1.07 | 36% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.39 | 1.07 | 36% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.135 | 9.458 | 75% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.16B | 109B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.67 | 1.12 | 149% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.46 | 9.38 | 90% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.28 | 28.34 | 110% |
| Returns for 5 years | 55.90 | 54.66 | 102% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 79.18 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers