Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LTFOX vs RMEBX
LTFOX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts LTFOX vs RMEBX
Lord Abbett Affiliated F3
Price$20.90
Change+$0.08 (+0.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.24B
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$61.36
Change+$0.09 (+0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets109.8B
LTFOX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LTFOX vs. RMEBX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LTFOX is a Hold and RMEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 110B vs. LTFOX (6.24B). LTFOX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: LTFOX (1.57) vs RMEBX (1.05). LTFOX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: LTFOX (9 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than LTFOX (0.39). LTFOX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). LTFOX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMEBX: LTFOX (0) vs RMEBX (250). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.86 vs. LTFOX (3.15). RMEBX (51.57) and LTFOX (50.63) have equivalent 5 years return.
| LTFOX | RMEBX | LTFOX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.39 | 1.07 | 36% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.39 | 1.07 | 36% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.502 | 12.627 | 91% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.24B | 110B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.57 | 1.05 | 148% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.15 | 5.86 | 54% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.22 | 27.41 | 110% |
| Returns for 5 years | 50.63 | 51.57 | 98% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 82.95 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement