Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LTFOX vs RMEBX
LTFOX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts LTFOX vs RMEBX
Lord Abbett Affiliated F3
Price$20.64
Change-$0.07 (-0.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.3B
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$60.71
Change+$0.28 (+0.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets109.34B
LTFOX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LTFOX vs. RMEBX commentary
Sep 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LTFOX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 109B vs. LTFOX (6.3B). LTFOX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: LTFOX (1.62) vs RMEBX (1.09). LTFOX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: LTFOX (8 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than LTFOX (0.39). LTFOX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). LTFOX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMEBX: LTFOX (0) vs RMEBX (250). LTFOX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.94 vs. RMEBX (7.45). LTFOX (57.32) and RMEBX (55.11) have equivalent 5 years return.
| LTFOX | RMEBX | LTFOX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.39 | 1.07 | 36% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.39 | 1.07 | 36% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.552 | 11.179 | 94% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.3B | 109B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.62 | 1.09 | 149% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.94 | 7.45 | 133% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.55 | 31.44 | 110% |
| Returns for 5 years | 57.32 | 55.11 | 104% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 89.18 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement