Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LTFOX vs RMEBX
LTFOX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts LTFOX vs RMEBX
Lord Abbett Affiliated F3
Price$19.54
Change-$0.01 (-0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.03B
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$57.64
Change-$0.04 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets105.22B
LTFOX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LTFOX vs. RMEBX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LTFOX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 105B vs. LTFOX (6.03B). LTFOX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: LTFOX (1.80) vs RMEBX (1.16). LTFOX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: LTFOX (8 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than LTFOX (0.39). LTFOX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). LTFOX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMEBX: LTFOX (0) vs RMEBX (250). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.30 vs. LTFOX (7.88). RMEBX (49.85) and LTFOX (47.88) have equivalent 5 years return.
| LTFOX | RMEBX | LTFOX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.39 | 1.07 | 36% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.39 | 1.07 | 36% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.993 | 5.349 | 75% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.03B | 105B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.80 | 1.16 | 155% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.88 | 8.30 | 95% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.23 | 17.96 | 113% |
| Returns for 5 years | 47.88 | 49.85 | 96% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 68.21 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers