Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LTFOX vs RMFCX
LTFOX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts LTFOX vs RMFCX
Lord Abbett Affiliated F3
Price$20.82
Change-$0.05 (-0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.26B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$60.93
Change-$0.21 (-0.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets110.19B
LTFOX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LTFOX vs. RMFCX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LTFOX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 110B vs. LTFOX (6.26B). LTFOX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: LTFOX (1.57) vs RMFCX (1.21). LTFOX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: LTFOX (9 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than LTFOX (0.39). LTFOX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). LTFOX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: LTFOX (0) vs RMFCX (250). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.59 vs. LTFOX (3.14). RMFCX (51.85) and LTFOX (50.28) have equivalent 5 years return.
| LTFOX | RMFCX | LTFOX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.39 | 0.91 | 43% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.39 | 0.91 | 43% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.770 | 12.617 | 93% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.26B | 110B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.57 | 1.21 | 129% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.14 | 5.59 | 56% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.53 | 27.75 | 110% |
| Returns for 5 years | 50.28 | 51.85 | 97% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 84.46 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement