Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LTFOX vs RMFCX
LTFOX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts LTFOX vs RMFCX
Lord Abbett Affiliated F3
Price$20.64
Change-$0.07 (-0.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.3B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$60.45
Change+$0.07 (+0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets109.34B
LTFOX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LTFOX vs. RMFCX commentary
Sep 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LTFOX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 109B vs. LTFOX (6.3B). LTFOX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: LTFOX (1.62) vs RMFCX (1.24). LTFOX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: LTFOX (8 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than LTFOX (0.39). LTFOX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). LTFOX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: LTFOX (0) vs RMFCX (250). LTFOX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.94 vs. RMFCX (7.71). LTFOX (57.32) and RMFCX (56.41) have equivalent 5 years return.
| LTFOX | RMFCX | LTFOX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.39 | 0.91 | 43% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.39 | 0.91 | 43% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.552 | 11.421 | 92% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.3B | 109B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.62 | 1.24 | 131% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.94 | 7.71 | 129% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.55 | 32.16 | 107% |
| Returns for 5 years | 57.32 | 56.41 | 102% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 91.12 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement