Ad is loading...
LTFOX vs RMFCX
LTFOX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts LTFOX vs RMFCX
Lord Abbett Affiliated F3
Price$18.47
Change+$0.05 (+0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.74B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$54.02
Change+$0.19 (+0.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets98.75B
LTFOX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LTFOX vs. RMFCX commentary
Apr 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LTFOX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 98.8B vs. LTFOX (5.74B). LTFOX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: LTFOX (1.84) vs RMFCX (1.34). LTFOX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: LTFOX (8 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than LTFOX (0.39). LTFOX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). LTFOX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: LTFOX (0) vs RMFCX (250). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.67 vs. LTFOX (3.32). LTFOX (51.75) and RMFCX (51.22) have equivalent 5 years return.
| LTFOX | RMFCX | LTFOX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.39 | 0.91 | 43% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.39 | 0.91 | 43% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.018 | -0.733 | 275% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.74B | 98.8B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.84 | 1.34 | 137% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.32 | 4.67 | 71% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.98 | 13.31 | 112% |
| Returns for 5 years | 51.75 | 51.22 | 101% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 56.86 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers