LTGHF
Price
$0.79
Change
-$0.03 (-3.66%)
Updated
Jul 8 closing price
Capitalization
1.13B
MCVEF
Price
$19.83
Change
+$0.40 (+2.06%)
Updated
Apr 17 closing price
Capitalization
4.34B
Interact to see
Advertisement

LTGHF vs MCVEF

Header iconLTGHF vs MCVEF Comparison
Open Charts LTGHF vs MCVEFBanner chart's image
Life Healthcare Group Holdings
Price$0.79
Change-$0.03 (-3.66%)
Volume$666
Capitalization1.13B
Medicover AB
Price$19.83
Change+$0.40 (+2.06%)
Volume$505
Capitalization4.34B
LTGHF vs MCVEF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
LTGHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LTGHF vs. MCVEF commentary
Aug 17, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LTGHF is a Hold and MCVEF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 17, 2025
Stock price -- (LTGHF: $0.79 vs. MCVEF: $19.83)
Brand notoriety: LTGHF and MCVEF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Hospital/Nursing Management industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LTGHF: 140% vs. MCVEF: 100%
Market capitalization -- LTGHF: $1.13B vs. MCVEF: $4.34B
LTGHF [@Hospital/Nursing Management] is valued at $1.13B. MCVEF’s [@Hospital/Nursing Management] market capitalization is $4.34B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Hospital/Nursing Management] industry ranges from $92.61B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Hospital/Nursing Management] industry is $3.97B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LTGHF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMCVEF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • LTGHF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MCVEF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, LTGHF is a better buy in the long-term than MCVEF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LTGHF’s TA Score shows that 0 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • LTGHF’s TA Score: 0 bullish, 1 bearish.

Price Growth

LTGHF (@Hospital/Nursing Management) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while MCVEF (@Hospital/Nursing Management) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Hospital/Nursing Management industry was +1.81%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.50%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.42%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Hospital/Nursing Management (+1.81% weekly)

Hospital/Nursing Management companies own and operate health care facilities. Their operations include nursing homes, acute care facilities, retirement centers and outpatient surgery centers. HCA Healthcare Inc., Alcon Inc. and Universal Health Services, Inc. are some major companies in this industry. Technology has been at the forefront of development of advanced solutions, including quicker diagnoses of complex conditions. Investments in new diagnostics, healthcare IoT, and other healthcare technologies continue to gather momentum in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCVEF($4.34B) has a higher market cap than LTGHF($1.13B). MCVEF has higher P/E ratio than LTGHF: MCVEF (83.33) vs LTGHF (10.86). MCVEF YTD gains are higher at: 31.761 vs. LTGHF (-22.030). LTGHF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.58B vs. MCVEF (324M). LTGHF has more cash in the bank: 618M vs. MCVEF (89.4M). MCVEF has less debt than LTGHF: MCVEF (1.42B) vs LTGHF (4.29B). LTGHF has higher revenues than MCVEF: LTGHF (26.4B) vs MCVEF (2.26B).
LTGHFMCVEFLTGHF / MCVEF
Capitalization1.13B4.34B26%
EBITDA1.58B324M489%
Gain YTD-22.03031.761-69%
P/E Ratio10.8683.3313%
Revenue26.4B2.26B1,169%
Total Cash618M89.4M691%
Total Debt4.29B1.42B301%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LTGHF vs MCVEF: Fundamental Ratings
LTGHF
MCVEF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
7
Undervalued
74
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10072
SMR RATING
1..100
9672
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5252
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5975
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
3030

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LTGHF's Valuation (7) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for MCVEF (74). This means that LTGHF’s stock grew significantly faster than MCVEF’s over the last 12 months.

MCVEF's Profit vs Risk Rating (72) in the null industry is in the same range as LTGHF (100). This means that MCVEF’s stock grew similarly to LTGHF’s over the last 12 months.

MCVEF's SMR Rating (72) in the null industry is in the same range as LTGHF (96). This means that MCVEF’s stock grew similarly to LTGHF’s over the last 12 months.

MCVEF's Price Growth Rating (52) in the null industry is in the same range as LTGHF (52). This means that MCVEF’s stock grew similarly to LTGHF’s over the last 12 months.

LTGHF's P/E Growth Rating (59) in the null industry is in the same range as MCVEF (75). This means that LTGHF’s stock grew similarly to MCVEF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LTGHFMCVEF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
4%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
16%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
4%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
18%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
33%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LTGHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JMNCX13.100.02
+0.15%
JPMorgan Research Market Neutral C
HRINX55.330.07
+0.13%
Harbor International Administrative
NRICX22.250.01
+0.04%
Nuveen Real Asset Income C
SMNIX26.19-0.06
-0.23%
Steward Equity Market Neutral I
RMFGX60.78-0.15
-0.25%
American Funds American Mutual R6

LTGHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LTGHF and CHE have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LTGHF and CHE's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LTGHF
1D Price
Change %
LTGHF100%
N/A
CHE - LTGHF
29%
Poorly correlated
+0.28%
INNV - LTGHF
10%
Poorly correlated
-2.83%
AVAH - LTGHF
7%
Poorly correlated
-1.67%
AGL - LTGHF
5%
Poorly correlated
+4.72%
LFST - LTGHF
0%
Poorly correlated
-2.51%
More