LTL vs PARA
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LTL is a StrongBuy and PARA is a StrongBuy.
PARA | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 70 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 25 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 95 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 59 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 4 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| LTL | PARA | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 70% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 66% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 75% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 79% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 75% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 73% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 70% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 75% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 61% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 78% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| RDIV | 51.73 | 0.62 | +1.22% |
| Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF | |||
| GREI | 35.78 | 0.27 | +0.76% |
| Goldman Sachs Ft Rl Estt & Infrs Eq ETF | |||
| FEUS | 66.64 | 0.30 | +0.45% |
| FlexShares ESG & Clmt US Lrg Cap Cr Idx | |||
| SPIB | 32.93 | -0.02 | -0.06% |
| SPDR® Portfolio Interm Term Corp Bd ETF | |||
| XMPT | 22.26 | -0.06 | -0.27% |
| VanEck CEF Municipal Income ETF | |||
LTL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LTL has been closely correlated with GOOGL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LTL jumps, then GOOGL could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LTL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LTL | 100% | -0.48% | ||
| GOOGL - LTL | 72% Closely correlated | -4.74% | ||
| PARA - LTL | 25% Poorly correlated | +4.82% | ||
| MTCH - LTL | 24% Poorly correlated | +3.58% | ||
| GOOG - LTL | 16% Poorly correlated | -4.56% | ||
| CLFD - LTL | 12% Poorly correlated | +3.02% | ||
More | ||||
PARA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PARA has been closely correlated with PARAA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PARA jumps, then PARAA could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PARA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PARA | 100% | +4.82% | ||
| PARAA - PARA | 69% Closely correlated | +5.62% | ||
| WBD - PARA | 53% Loosely correlated | +2.81% | ||
| NXST - PARA | 52% Loosely correlated | +1.37% | ||
| SBGI - PARA | 44% Loosely correlated | +4.06% | ||
| FOX - PARA | 42% Loosely correlated | +1.73% | ||
More | ||||