Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LTMBX vs RBHHX
LTMBX vs RBHHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LTMBX vs. RBHHX commentary
Sep 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LTMBX is a Hold and RBHHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RBHHX has more cash in the bank: 43.1B vs. LTMBX (561M). LTMBX pays higher dividends than RBHHX: LTMBX (1.20) vs RBHHX (0.66). LTMBX was incepted earlier than RBHHX: LTMBX (13 years) vs RBHHX (11 years). LTMBX (1.80) is less costly to investors than RBHHX (1.17). LTMBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 14.00 vs. RBHHX (5.00). RBHHX has a lower initial minimum investment than LTMBX: RBHHX (250) vs LTMBX (1000). RBHHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.10 vs. LTMBX (11.69). LTMBX (44.28) and RBHHX (42.92) have equivalent 5 years return.
| LTMBX | RBHHX | LTMBX / RBHHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.57 | 1.17 | 134% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.80 | 1.17 | 154% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.960 | 14.313 | 84% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 561M | 43.1B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.20 | 0.66 | 183% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.69 | 16.10 | 73% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.61 | 38.69 | 77% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.28 | 42.92 | 103% |
| Returns for 10 years | 93.86 | 89.89 | 104% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers