Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LTMBX vs REHTX
LTMBX vs REHTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LTMBX vs. REHTX commentary
Sep 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LTMBX is a Hold and REHTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
REHTX has more cash in the bank: 43.1B vs. LTMBX (561M). REHTX (1.24) and LTMBX (1.20) have matching dividends . LTMBX was incepted earlier than REHTX: LTMBX (13 years) vs REHTX (19 years). LTMBX (1.80) is less costly to investors than REHTX (0.42). LTMBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 14.00 vs. REHTX (5.00). REHTX has a lower initial minimum investment than LTMBX: REHTX (250) vs LTMBX (1000). REHTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.11 vs. LTMBX (11.69). REHTX return over 5 years is better than : 47.19 vs. LTMBX (44.28).
| LTMBX | REHTX | LTMBX / REHTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.57 | 0.42 | 374% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.80 | 0.42 | 429% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.960 | 14.923 | 80% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 561M | 43.1B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.20 | 1.24 | 97% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.69 | 17.11 | 68% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.61 | 41.18 | 72% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.28 | 47.19 | 94% |
| Returns for 10 years | 93.86 | 99.32 | 94% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers