Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LTNCX vs OLCAX
LTNCX vs OLCAX Comparison
Open Charts LTNCX vs OLCAX
Invesco Rochester® Limited Tm NY Mncpl C
Price$2.78
Change+$0.01 (+0.36%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.43B
Invesco Limited Term CA Municipal A
Price$3.10
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets848.56M
LTNCX vs OLCAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LTNCX vs. OLCAX commentary
Sep 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LTNCX is a Hold and OLCAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LTNCX has more cash in the bank: 1.43B vs. OLCAX (849M). OLCAX pays higher dividends than LTNCX: OLCAX (2.66) vs LTNCX (2.26). LTNCX was incepted earlier than OLCAX: LTNCX (28 years) vs OLCAX (22 years). LTNCX (1.58) is less costly to investors than OLCAX (0.81). LTNCX (26.00) and OLCAX (25.00) have comparable annual turnover. LTNCX (1000) and OLCAX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. OLCAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.36 vs. LTNCX (0.81). OLCAX return over 5 years is better than : 5.06 vs. LTNCX (2.28).
| LTNCX | OLCAX | LTNCX / OLCAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.58 | 0.81 | 195% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.58 | 0.81 | 195% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 22 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.993 | 1.324 | 75% |
| Front Load | N/A | 3% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.43B | 849M | 168% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.26 | 2.66 | 85% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.81 | 1.36 | 59% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.96 | 8.75 | 91% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.28 | 5.06 | 45% |
| Returns for 10 years | 13.63 | 16.92 | 81% |