Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LTNCX vs SFCIX
LTNCX vs SFCIX Comparison
Open Charts LTNCX vs SFCIX
Invesco Rochester® Limited Tm NY Mncpl C
Price$2.75
Change+$0.01 (+0.36%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.41B
Allspring California Ltd-Trm Tx-Fr A
Price$10.29
Change+$0.02 (+0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets342.52M
LTNCX vs SFCIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LTNCX vs. SFCIX commentary
Sep 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LTNCX is a Hold and SFCIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LTNCX has more cash in the bank: 1.41B vs. SFCIX (343M). LTNCX (2.26) and SFCIX (2.17) have matching dividends . LTNCX was incepted earlier than SFCIX: LTNCX (28 years) vs SFCIX (33 years). LTNCX (1.58) is less costly to investors than SFCIX (0.86). LTNCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 26.00 vs. SFCIX (24.00). LTNCX (1000) and SFCIX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. SFCIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.81 vs. LTNCX (-0.28). SFCIX return over 5 years is better than : 3.94 vs. LTNCX (1.17).
| LTNCX | SFCIX | LTNCX / SFCIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.58 | 0.80 | 198% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.58 | 0.86 | 184% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.101 | 2.884 | -3% |
| Front Load | N/A | 2% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.41B | 343M | 412% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.26 | 2.17 | 104% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.28 | 2.81 | -10% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.02 | 9.29 | 65% |
| Returns for 5 years | 1.17 | 3.94 | 30% |
| Returns for 10 years | 12.40 | 7.87 | 158% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement