Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LTNCX vs SFCIX
LTNCX vs SFCIX Comparison
Open Charts LTNCX vs SFCIX
Invesco Rochester® Limited Tm NY Mncpl C
Price$2.78
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.43B
Allspring California Ltd-Trm Tx-Fr A
Price$10.32
Change+$0.01 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets336.39M
LTNCX vs SFCIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LTNCX vs. SFCIX commentary
Oct 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LTNCX is a Hold and SFCIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LTNCX has more cash in the bank: 1.43B vs. SFCIX (336M). LTNCX pays higher dividends than SFCIX: LTNCX (2.70) vs SFCIX (2.16). LTNCX was incepted earlier than SFCIX: LTNCX (28 years) vs SFCIX (33 years). LTNCX (1.58) is less costly to investors than SFCIX (0.86). LTNCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 26.00 vs. SFCIX (24.00). LTNCX (1000) and SFCIX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. SFCIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.32 vs. LTNCX (1.78). SFCIX return over 5 years is better than : 4.63 vs. LTNCX (3.62).
| LTNCX | SFCIX | LTNCX / SFCIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.58 | 0.80 | 198% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.58 | 0.86 | 184% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.830 | 3.476 | 53% |
| Front Load | N/A | 2% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.43B | 336M | 425% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.70 | 2.16 | 125% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.78 | 3.32 | 54% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.29 | 11.48 | 90% |
| Returns for 5 years | 3.62 | 4.63 | 78% |
| Returns for 10 years | 13.81 | 7.80 | 177% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement