Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LTNSX vs VWALX
LTNSX vs VWALX Comparison
Open Charts LTNSX vs VWALX
Lord Abbett National Tax Free C
Price$10.21
Change+$0.02 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.6B
Vanguard High-Yield Tax-Exempt Adm
Price$10.47
Change+$0.02 (+0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets15.64B
LTNSX vs VWALX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LTNSX vs. VWALX commentary
Sep 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LTNSX is a Hold and VWALX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VWALX has more cash in the bank: 15.6B vs. LTNSX (4.6B). VWALX pays higher dividends than LTNSX: VWALX (4.10) vs LTNSX (3.26). LTNSX was incepted earlier than VWALX: LTNSX (29 years) vs VWALX (24 years). LTNSX (1.39) is less costly to investors than VWALX (0.09). VWALX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. LTNSX (27.00). LTNSX has a lower initial minimum investment than VWALX: LTNSX (1000) vs VWALX (50000). LTNSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.24 vs. VWALX (-3.37). LTNSX return over 5 years is better than : -1.95 vs. VWALX (-10.43).
| LTNSX | VWALX | LTNSX / VWALX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.39 | 0.09 | 1,544% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.39 | 0.09 | 1,544% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.624 | -1.644 | 38% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 50000 | 2% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.6B | 15.6B | 30% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.26 | 4.10 | 79% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.24 | -3.37 | 37% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.72 | 1.70 | 513% |
| Returns for 5 years | -1.95 | -10.43 | 19% |
| Returns for 10 years | 9.06 | -5.01 | -181% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement