Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LTNSX vs VWALX
LTNSX vs VWALX Comparison
Open Charts LTNSX vs VWALX
Lord Abbett National Tax Free C
Price$10.39
Change-$0.01 (-0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.86B
Vanguard High-Yield Tax-Exempt Adm
Price$10.70
Change-$0.01 (-0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets16.24B
LTNSX vs VWALX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LTNSX vs. VWALX commentary
Oct 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LTNSX is a Hold and VWALX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VWALX has more cash in the bank: 16.2B vs. LTNSX (4.86B). VWALX pays higher dividends than LTNSX: VWALX (4.01) vs LTNSX (3.18). LTNSX was incepted earlier than VWALX: LTNSX (29 years) vs VWALX (24 years). LTNSX (1.39) is less costly to investors than VWALX (0.09). VWALX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. LTNSX (27.00). LTNSX has a lower initial minimum investment than VWALX: LTNSX (1000) vs VWALX (50000). LTNSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.36 vs. VWALX (0.71). LTNSX return over 5 years is better than : 1.21 vs. VWALX (-7.57).
| LTNSX | VWALX | LTNSX / VWALX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.39 | 0.09 | 1,544% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.39 | 0.09 | 1,544% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.704 | 0.803 | 212% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 50000 | 2% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.86B | 16.2B | 30% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.18 | 4.01 | 79% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.36 | 0.71 | 333% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.06 | 10.65 | 170% |
| Returns for 5 years | 1.21 | -7.57 | -16% |
| Returns for 10 years | 10.62 | -3.51 | -302% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement