Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LTNYX vs SFCCX
LTNYX vs SFCCX Comparison
Open Charts LTNYX vs SFCCX
Invesco Rochester® Limited Tm NY Mncpl A
Price$2.80
Change+$0.01 (+0.36%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.43B
Allspring California Ltd-Trm Tx-Fr C
Price$10.32
Change+$0.01 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets336.39M
LTNYX vs SFCCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LTNYX vs. SFCCX commentary
Oct 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LTNYX is a Hold and SFCCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LTNYX has more cash in the bank: 1.43B vs. SFCCX (336M). LTNYX pays higher dividends than SFCCX: LTNYX (3.45) vs SFCCX (1.42). LTNYX was incepted earlier than SFCCX: LTNYX (34 years) vs SFCCX (23 years). SFCCX (1.61) is less costly to investors than LTNYX (0.83). LTNYX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 26.00 vs. SFCCX (24.00). LTNYX (1000) and SFCCX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. SFCCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.55 vs. LTNYX (2.13). LTNYX return over 5 years is better than : 7.23 vs. SFCCX (1.27).
| LTNYX | SFCCX | LTNYX / SFCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 1.55 | 54% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 1.61 | 52% |
| Fund Existence | 34 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.349 | 2.998 | 78% |
| Front Load | 3% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.43B | 336M | 425% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.45 | 1.42 | 243% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.13 | 2.55 | 84% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.32 | 9.12 | 135% |
| Returns for 5 years | 7.23 | 1.27 | 569% |
| Returns for 10 years | 17.47 | 2.42 | 722% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement