Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LTNYX vs SFCNX
LTNYX vs SFCNX Comparison
Open Charts LTNYX vs SFCNX
Invesco Rochester® Limited Tm NY Mncpl A
Price$2.77
Change+$0.01 (+0.36%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.41B
Allspring California Ltd-Trm Tx-FrInst
Price$10.11
Change+$0.01 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets342.52M
LTNYX vs SFCNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LTNYX vs. SFCNX commentary
Sep 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LTNYX is a Hold and SFCNX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LTNYX has more cash in the bank: 1.41B vs. SFCNX (343M). LTNYX pays higher dividends than SFCNX: LTNYX (2.91) vs SFCNX (2.46). LTNYX was incepted earlier than SFCNX: LTNYX (34 years) vs SFCNX (11 years). LTNYX (0.83) is less costly to investors than SFCNX (0.54). LTNYX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 26.00 vs. SFCNX (24.00). LTNYX has a lower initial minimum investment than SFCNX: LTNYX (1000) vs SFCNX (1000000). SFCNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.13 vs. LTNYX (0.73). SFCNX return over 5 years is better than : 5.30 vs. LTNYX (5.03).
| LTNYX | SFCNX | LTNYX / SFCNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 0.50 | 166% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 0.54 | 154% |
| Fund Existence | 34 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.658 | 3.111 | 21% |
| Front Load | 3% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.41B | 343M | 412% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.91 | 2.46 | 118% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.73 | 3.13 | 23% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.33 | 10.13 | 82% |
| Returns for 5 years | 5.03 | 5.30 | 95% |
| Returns for 10 years | 15.91 | 10.12 | 157% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement