LTOUF
Price
$37.00
Change
+$1.25 (+3.50%)
Updated
Apr 16 closing price
Capitalization
59.06B
MLLUY
Price
$3.49
Change
-$0.14 (-3.86%)
Updated
Jun 17 closing price
Capitalization
3.62B
Interact to see
Advertisement

LTOUF vs MLLUY

Header iconLTOUF vs MLLUY Comparison
Open Charts LTOUF vs MLLUYBanner chart's image
Larsen & Toubro
Price$37.00
Change+$1.25 (+3.50%)
Volume$302
Capitalization59.06B
Metallurgical Corp China
Price$3.49
Change-$0.14 (-3.86%)
Volume$159
Capitalization3.62B
LTOUF vs MLLUY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LTOUF vs. MLLUY commentary
Jun 30, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LTOUF is a Hold and MLLUY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 30, 2025
Stock price -- (LTOUF: $36.21 vs. MLLUY: $3.49)
Brand notoriety: LTOUF and MLLUY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Engineering & Construction industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LTOUF: 100% vs. MLLUY: 1%
Market capitalization -- LTOUF: $59.06B vs. MLLUY: $3.62B
LTOUF [@Engineering & Construction] is valued at $59.06B. MLLUY’s [@Engineering & Construction] market capitalization is $3.62B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Engineering & Construction] industry ranges from $14.67T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Engineering & Construction] industry is $7.19B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LTOUF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMLLUY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • LTOUF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MLLUY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, MLLUY is a better buy in the long-term than LTOUF.

Price Growth

LTOUF (@Engineering & Construction) experienced а -2.14% price change this week, while MLLUY (@Engineering & Construction) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Engineering & Construction industry was +27.61%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +200.83%, and the average quarterly price growth was +154.19%.

Reported Earning Dates

MLLUY is expected to report earnings on Apr 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Engineering & Construction (+27.61% weekly)

Engineering & Construction includes companies that engage in non-residential construction and contract services, including ventilation, heating and air conditioning (HVAC) services. The level/value of construction & engineering activity is one of the potentially relevant indicators of the health of businesses, and hence of the overall economy. Some of the large-cap U.S. companies in this industry include Jacobs Engineering Group Inc,, AECOM and Quanta Services, Inc.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LTOUF($59.1B) has a higher market cap than MLLUY($3.62B). LTOUF has higher P/E ratio than MLLUY: LTOUF (29.12) vs MLLUY (6.26). MLLUY YTD gains are higher at: -5.420 vs. LTOUF (-18.949). LTOUF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 310B vs. MLLUY (11.5B). LTOUF has higher revenues than MLLUY: LTOUF (2.54T) vs MLLUY (524B).
LTOUFMLLUYLTOUF / MLLUY
Capitalization59.1B3.62B1,634%
EBITDA310B11.5B2,696%
Gain YTD-18.949-5.420350%
P/E Ratio29.126.26465%
Revenue2.54T524B485%
Total CashN/A50.2B-
Total DebtN/A134B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LTOUF vs MLLUY: Fundamental Ratings
LTOUF
MLLUY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9950
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
72
Overvalued
13
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1284
SMR RATING
1..100
5182
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6062
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8516
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5095

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MLLUY's Valuation (13) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LTOUF (72). This means that MLLUY’s stock grew somewhat faster than LTOUF’s over the last 12 months.

LTOUF's Profit vs Risk Rating (12) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for MLLUY (84). This means that LTOUF’s stock grew significantly faster than MLLUY’s over the last 12 months.

LTOUF's SMR Rating (51) in the null industry is in the same range as MLLUY (82). This means that LTOUF’s stock grew similarly to MLLUY’s over the last 12 months.

LTOUF's Price Growth Rating (60) in the null industry is in the same range as MLLUY (62). This means that LTOUF’s stock grew similarly to MLLUY’s over the last 12 months.

MLLUY's P/E Growth Rating (16) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for LTOUF (85). This means that MLLUY’s stock grew significantly faster than LTOUF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CHTCX18.260.13
+0.72%
Invesco Charter C
LSRCX1.810.01
+0.56%
Lord Abbett Small Cap Value C
BIDVX15.390.08
+0.52%
BlackRock GA Disciplined Vol Eq Instl
GMSMX19.600.08
+0.44%
GuideMark® Small/Mid Cap Core Service
FKINX2.41N/A
N/A
Franklin Income A1

LTOUF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LTOUF has been loosely correlated with OBSJF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LTOUF jumps, then OBSJF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LTOUF
1D Price
Change %
LTOUF100%
N/A
OBSJF - LTOUF
37%
Loosely correlated
N/A
GKTRF - LTOUF
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ESOA - LTOUF
14%
Poorly correlated
-0.42%
WLDN - LTOUF
13%
Poorly correlated
+0.21%
ORN - LTOUF
11%
Poorly correlated
+0.44%
More

MLLUY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MLLUY and KAJMF have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MLLUY and KAJMF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MLLUY
1D Price
Change %
MLLUY100%
N/A
KAJMF - MLLUY
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PNOCF - MLLUY
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NWSGY - MLLUY
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MRCR - MLLUY
5%
Poorly correlated
-1.11%
LTOUF - MLLUY
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More