LTOUF
Price
$37.00
Change
+$1.25 (+3.50%)
Updated
Apr 16 closing price
Capitalization
57.1B
MRCR
Price
$2.87
Change
-$0.05 (-1.71%)
Updated
May 22 closing price
Capitalization
17.56M
Interact to see
Advertisement

LTOUF vs MRCR

Header iconLTOUF vs MRCR Comparison
Open Charts LTOUF vs MRCRBanner chart's image
Larsen & Toubro
Price$37.00
Change+$1.25 (+3.50%)
Volume$302
Capitalization57.1B
Moro
Price$2.87
Change-$0.05 (-1.71%)
Volume$7.15K
Capitalization17.56M
LTOUF vs MRCR Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LTOUF vs. MRCR commentary
May 23, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LTOUF is a Hold and MRCR is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
May 23, 2025
Stock price -- (LTOUF: $37.00 vs. MRCR: $2.87)
Brand notoriety: LTOUF and MRCR are both not notable
Both companies represent the Engineering & Construction industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LTOUF: 116% vs. MRCR: 186%
Market capitalization -- LTOUF: $57.1B vs. MRCR: $17.56M
LTOUF [@Engineering & Construction] is valued at $57.1B. MRCR’s [@Engineering & Construction] market capitalization is $17.56M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Engineering & Construction] industry ranges from $14.67T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Engineering & Construction] industry is $6.66B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LTOUF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMRCR’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • LTOUF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • MRCR’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, MRCR is a better buy in the long-term than LTOUF.

Price Growth

LTOUF (@Engineering & Construction) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while MRCR (@Engineering & Construction) price change was +10.38% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Engineering & Construction industry was +0.31%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +12.74%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.58%.

Reported Earning Dates

MRCR is expected to report earnings on Nov 18, 2024.

Industries' Descriptions

@Engineering & Construction (+0.31% weekly)

Engineering & Construction includes companies that engage in non-residential construction and contract services, including ventilation, heating and air conditioning (HVAC) services. The level/value of construction & engineering activity is one of the potentially relevant indicators of the health of businesses, and hence of the overall economy. Some of the large-cap U.S. companies in this industry include Jacobs Engineering Group Inc,, AECOM and Quanta Services, Inc.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LTOUF($57.1B) has a higher market cap than MRCR($17.6M). MRCR YTD gains are higher at: 36.667 vs. LTOUF (-18.949).
LTOUFMRCRLTOUF / MRCR
Capitalization57.1B17.6M324,432%
EBITDA129BN/A-
Gain YTD-18.94936.667-52%
P/E Ratio79.22N/A-
Revenue744BN/A-
Total Cash717BN/A-
Total Debt1.32TN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LTOUF vs MRCR: Fundamental Ratings
LTOUF
MRCR
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4820
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
94
Overvalued
24
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
112
SMR RATING
1..100
1008
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7637
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
669
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MRCR's Valuation (24) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for LTOUF (94). This means that MRCR’s stock grew significantly faster than LTOUF’s over the last 12 months.

MRCR's Profit vs Risk Rating (2) in the null industry is in the same range as LTOUF (11). This means that MRCR’s stock grew similarly to LTOUF’s over the last 12 months.

MRCR's SMR Rating (8) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for LTOUF (100). This means that MRCR’s stock grew significantly faster than LTOUF’s over the last 12 months.

MRCR's Price Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LTOUF (76). This means that MRCR’s stock grew somewhat faster than LTOUF’s over the last 12 months.

LTOUF's P/E Growth Rating (6) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MRCR (69). This means that LTOUF’s stock grew somewhat faster than MRCR’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FBY15.650.05
+0.30%
YieldMax META Option Income Strategy ETF
PSFF29.37N/A
N/A
Pacer Swan SOS Fund of Funds ETF
RDFI23.06N/A
N/A
Rareview Dynamic Fixed Income ETF
CARU30.04N/A
N/A
Max Auto Industry 3X Leveraged ETN
RQI12.06-0.11
-0.90%
COHEN & STEERS QUALITY Income REALTY FUND

LTOUF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LTOUF has been loosely correlated with OBSJF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LTOUF jumps, then OBSJF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LTOUF
1D Price
Change %
LTOUF100%
N/A
OBSJF - LTOUF
37%
Loosely correlated
N/A
GKTRF - LTOUF
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ESOA - LTOUF
14%
Poorly correlated
-1.07%
WLDN - LTOUF
13%
Poorly correlated
+0.23%
ORN - LTOUF
11%
Poorly correlated
-5.43%
More

MRCR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MRCR and LTOUF have been poorly correlated (+6% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MRCR and LTOUF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MRCR
1D Price
Change %
MRCR100%
-1.71%
LTOUF - MRCR
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MLLUY - MRCR
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NWSZF - MRCR
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KAJMY - MRCR
2%
Poorly correlated
+13.90%
KIERF - MRCR
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More