LTOUF
Price
$41.00
Change
+$0.60 (+1.49%)
Updated
Aug 18 closing price
Capitalization
56.5B
WLDN
Price
$106.07
Change
-$3.79 (-3.45%)
Updated
Sep 2, 02:58 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.61B
58 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

LTOUF vs WLDN

Header iconLTOUF vs WLDN Comparison
Open Charts LTOUF vs WLDNBanner chart's image
Larsen & Toubro
Price$41.00
Change+$0.60 (+1.49%)
Volume$170
Capitalization56.5B
Willdan Group
Price$106.07
Change-$3.79 (-3.45%)
Volume$575
Capitalization1.61B
LTOUF vs WLDN Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
LTOUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WLDN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LTOUF vs. WLDN commentary
Sep 02, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LTOUF is a Buy and WLDN is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 02, 2025
Stock price -- (LTOUF: $41.00 vs. WLDN: $109.86)
Brand notoriety: LTOUF and WLDN are both not notable
Both companies represent the Engineering & Construction industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LTOUF: 95% vs. WLDN: 78%
Market capitalization -- LTOUF: $56.5B vs. WLDN: $1.61B
LTOUF [@Engineering & Construction] is valued at $56.5B. WLDN’s [@Engineering & Construction] market capitalization is $1.61B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Engineering & Construction] industry ranges from $14.67T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Engineering & Construction] industry is $7.67B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LTOUF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileWLDN’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • LTOUF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • WLDN’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, WLDN is a better buy in the long-term than LTOUF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LTOUF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WLDN’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LTOUF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • WLDN’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LTOUF is a better buy in the short-term than WLDN.

Price Growth

LTOUF (@Engineering & Construction) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while WLDN (@Engineering & Construction) price change was -1.13% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Engineering & Construction industry was +0.20%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.64%, and the average quarterly price growth was +178.33%.

Reported Earning Dates

WLDN is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Engineering & Construction (+0.20% weekly)

Engineering & Construction includes companies that engage in non-residential construction and contract services, including ventilation, heating and air conditioning (HVAC) services. The level/value of construction & engineering activity is one of the potentially relevant indicators of the health of businesses, and hence of the overall economy. Some of the large-cap U.S. companies in this industry include Jacobs Engineering Group Inc,, AECOM and Quanta Services, Inc.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LTOUF($56.5B) has a higher market cap than WLDN($1.61B). WLDN has higher P/E ratio than LTOUF: WLDN (45.77) vs LTOUF (31.17). WLDN YTD gains are higher at: 188.422 vs. LTOUF (-9.217). LTOUF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 321B vs. WLDN (58M). LTOUF has higher revenues than WLDN: LTOUF (2.63T) vs WLDN (628M).
LTOUFWLDNLTOUF / WLDN
Capitalization56.5B1.61B3,507%
EBITDA321B58M553,448%
Gain YTD-9.217188.422-5%
P/E Ratio31.1745.7768%
Revenue2.63T628M418,471%
Total CashN/A32.3M-
Total DebtN/A75.5M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LTOUF vs WLDN: Fundamental Ratings
LTOUF
WLDN
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
74
Overvalued
96
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1223
SMR RATING
1..100
5153
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5335
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7917
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5085

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LTOUF's Valuation (74) in the null industry is in the same range as WLDN (96) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that LTOUF’s stock grew similarly to WLDN’s over the last 12 months.

LTOUF's Profit vs Risk Rating (12) in the null industry is in the same range as WLDN (23) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that LTOUF’s stock grew similarly to WLDN’s over the last 12 months.

LTOUF's SMR Rating (51) in the null industry is in the same range as WLDN (53) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that LTOUF’s stock grew similarly to WLDN’s over the last 12 months.

WLDN's Price Growth Rating (35) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is in the same range as LTOUF (53) in the null industry. This means that WLDN’s stock grew similarly to LTOUF’s over the last 12 months.

WLDN's P/E Growth Rating (17) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LTOUF (79) in the null industry. This means that WLDN’s stock grew somewhat faster than LTOUF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LTOUFWLDN
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
76%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
29%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
81%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
38%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
75%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
67%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
42%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
76%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
42%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
82%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
78%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
78%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
83%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
8%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
86%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LTOUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WLDN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MRAGX32.72-0.04
-0.12%
Meridian Growth A
PRSVX55.21-0.15
-0.27%
T. Rowe Price Small-Cap Value
WESWX11.51-0.04
-0.35%
TETON Westwood Equity AAA
NBNCX14.71-0.09
-0.61%
Neuberger Berman International Sel C
MTCLX77.62-0.91
-1.16%
MFS Technology R6

LTOUF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LTOUF has been loosely correlated with OBSJF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LTOUF jumps, then OBSJF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LTOUF
1D Price
Change %
LTOUF100%
N/A
OBSJF - LTOUF
37%
Loosely correlated
N/A
GKTRF - LTOUF
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ESOA - LTOUF
14%
Poorly correlated
-0.88%
WLDN - LTOUF
13%
Poorly correlated
-5.44%
ORN - LTOUF
11%
Poorly correlated
-2.89%
More

WLDN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WLDN has been loosely correlated with ACA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if WLDN jumps, then ACA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WLDN
1D Price
Change %
WLDN100%
-5.44%
ACA - WLDN
38%
Loosely correlated
-0.21%
GKTRF - WLDN
36%
Loosely correlated
N/A
ROAD - WLDN
35%
Loosely correlated
-1.29%
LMB - WLDN
32%
Poorly correlated
-7.14%
SKBSY - WLDN
32%
Poorly correlated
+1.28%
More