LTRBF
Price
$0.03
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jun 26 closing price
Capitalization
42.73M
LTUM
Price
$0.03
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Aug 25 closing price
Capitalization
3.9M
Interact to see
Advertisement

LTRBF vs LTUM

Header iconLTRBF vs LTUM Comparison
Open Charts LTRBF vs LTUMBanner chart's image
LATROBE MAGNESIUM
Price$0.03
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$10K
Capitalization42.73M
Lithium
Price$0.03
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$6.98K
Capitalization3.9M
LTRBF vs LTUM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
LTUM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LTRBF vs. LTUM commentary
Aug 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LTRBF is a Hold and LTUM is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 26, 2025
Stock price -- (LTRBF: $0.03 vs. LTUM: $0.03)
Brand notoriety: LTRBF and LTUM are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LTRBF: 100% vs. LTUM: 4%
Market capitalization -- LTRBF: $42.73M vs. LTUM: $3.9M
LTRBF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $42.73M. LTUM’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $3.9M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.3B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LTRBF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileLTUM’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • LTRBF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • LTUM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both LTRBF and LTUM are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LTUM’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • LTUM’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

LTRBF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while LTUM (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was -0.90% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +1.62%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.12%, and the average quarterly price growth was +95.81%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+1.62% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LTRBF($42.7M) has a higher market cap than LTUM($3.9M). LTRBF YTD gains are higher at: 3.030 vs. LTUM (-8.601). LTRBF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2M vs. LTUM (-640.82K).
LTRBFLTUMLTRBF / LTUM
Capitalization42.7M3.9M1,096%
EBITDA2M-640.82K-312%
Gain YTD3.030-8.601-35%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
RevenueN/A0-
Total CashN/A2.92M-
Total DebtN/AN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LTUM: Fundamental Ratings
LTUM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
89
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
99
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
57
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
41
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LTRBFLTUM
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
10%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
8%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
82%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
77%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LTUM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CGEH2.150.05
+2.38%
Capstone Green Energy Holdings Inc.
ALRHF171.41N/A
N/A
Allreal Holding Ag
CTARF2.00N/A
N/A
Centaurus Energy Inc.
NNGPF71.97N/A
N/A
NN Group NV
DSBX24.86-0.10
-0.40%
Dogwood State Bank RALEIGH NC

LTRBF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LTRBF has been loosely correlated with DCNNF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LTRBF jumps, then DCNNF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LTRBF
1D Price
Change %
LTRBF100%
N/A
DCNNF - LTRBF
34%
Loosely correlated
-25.18%
AMLM - LTRBF
28%
Poorly correlated
+0.26%
DAUGF - LTRBF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SRKZF - LTRBF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TCKRF - LTRBF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More