LTRBF
Price
$0.03
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jun 26 closing price
Capitalization
66.66M
SRKZF
Price
$0.02
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jun 9 closing price
Capitalization
2.16M
Interact to see
Advertisement

LTRBF vs SRKZF

Header iconLTRBF vs SRKZF Comparison
Open Charts LTRBF vs SRKZFBanner chart's image
LATROBE MAGNESIUM
Price$0.03
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$10K
Capitalization66.66M
Sky Gold
Price$0.02
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$100
Capitalization2.16M
LTRBF vs SRKZF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
LTRBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SRKZF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LTRBF vs. SRKZF commentary
Jul 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LTRBF is a Hold and SRKZF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 04, 2025
Stock price -- (LTRBF: $0.03 vs. SRKZF: $0.02)
Brand notoriety: LTRBF and SRKZF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LTRBF: 100% vs. SRKZF: 1%
Market capitalization -- LTRBF: $66.66M vs. SRKZF: $2.16M
LTRBF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $66.66M. SRKZF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $2.16M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.09B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LTRBF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSRKZF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • LTRBF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SRKZF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, SRKZF is a better buy in the long-term than LTRBF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LTRBF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SRKZF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LTRBF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • SRKZF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SRKZF is a better buy in the short-term than LTRBF.

Price Growth

LTRBF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while SRKZF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +3.12%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.79%, and the average quarterly price growth was +30.02%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+3.12% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LTRBF($66.7M) has a higher market cap than SRKZF($2.16M). SRKZF YTD gains are higher at: 5.588 vs. LTRBF (3.030).
LTRBFSRKZFLTRBF / SRKZF
Capitalization66.7M2.16M3,089%
EBITDA-4.26MN/A-
Gain YTD3.0305.58854%
P/E RatioN/A5.00-
RevenueN/AN/A-
Total Cash38.5KN/A-
Total Debt3.75MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SRKZF: Fundamental Ratings
SRKZF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
53
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
98
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
64
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
48
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LTRBFSRKZF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
25%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
25%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
20%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
10%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
8%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LTRBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SRKZF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
KSRYY8.010.16
+1.97%
Kose Corp.
ADRNY41.890.12
+0.29%
Koninklijke Ahold Delhaize N.V.
DEWY2.16N/A
N/A
Dewey Electronics Corp. (The)
LNDAF1.55N/A
N/A
LINEA DIRECTA ASEGURADORA SA
MRRDF0.59-0.01
-1.51%
Meridian Mining UK Societas

LTRBF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LTRBF has been loosely correlated with DCNNF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LTRBF jumps, then DCNNF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LTRBF
1D Price
Change %
LTRBF100%
N/A
DCNNF - LTRBF
34%
Loosely correlated
N/A
AMLM - LTRBF
28%
Poorly correlated
+13.80%
DAUGF - LTRBF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SRKZF - LTRBF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TCKRF - LTRBF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

SRKZF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SRKZF and LTRBF have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SRKZF and LTRBF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SRKZF
1D Price
Change %
SRKZF100%
N/A
LTRBF - SRKZF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
THURF - SRKZF
22%
Poorly correlated
+29.60%
GGIFF - SRKZF
22%
Poorly correlated
-21.15%
LYSDY - SRKZF
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.09%
CGNMF - SRKZF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More