LTSRF
Price
$0.12
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Dec 18 closing price
NWCCF
Price
$0.11
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Dec 16 closing price
Ad is loading...

LTSRF vs NWCCF

Header iconLTSRF vs NWCCF Comparison
Open Charts LTSRF vs NWCCFBanner chart's image
Lotus Resources
Price$0.12
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$740.98K
CapitalizationN/A
NORTHWEST COPPER
Price$0.11
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$163
CapitalizationN/A
LTSRF vs NWCCF Comparison Chart
Loading...
LTSRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NWCCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LTSRF vs. NWCCF commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LTSRF is a Hold and NWCCF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (LTSRF: $0.12 vs. NWCCF: $0.11)
Brand notoriety: LTSRF and NWCCF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LTSRF: 92% vs. NWCCF: 2%
Market capitalization -- LTSRF: $201.4M vs. NWCCF: $25.81M
LTSRF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $201.4M. NWCCF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $25.81M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.9B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LTSRF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileNWCCF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • LTSRF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • NWCCF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, NWCCF is a better buy in the long-term than LTSRF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LTSRF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NWCCF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LTSRF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • NWCCF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NWCCF is a better buy in the short-term than LTSRF.

Price Growth

LTSRF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -17.02% price change this week, while NWCCF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +3.73% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was -3.05%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.61%, and the average quarterly price growth was -3.34%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (-3.05% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LTSRF($201M) has a higher market cap than NWCCF($25.8M). NWCCF YTD gains are higher at: -9.147 vs. LTSRF (-41.791). NWCCF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -655.21K vs. LTSRF (-11.58M). LTSRF has more cash in the bank: 16.5M vs. NWCCF (3.76M). LTSRF has less debt than NWCCF: LTSRF (27.3K) vs NWCCF (112K).
LTSRFNWCCFLTSRF / NWCCF
Capitalization201M25.8M779%
EBITDA-11.58M-655.21K1,768%
Gain YTD-41.791-9.147457%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
RevenueN/A0-
Total Cash16.5M3.76M439%
Total Debt27.3K112K24%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NWCCF: Fundamental Ratings
NWCCF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
97
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
91
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
62
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
15
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LTSRFNWCCF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
77%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 23 days ago
57%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
86%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
81%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
82%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
LTSRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NWCCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FXP18.700.72
+4.00%
ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50
ISVL33.64-0.67
-1.95%
iShares Intl Dev Sm Cp Val Fctr ETF
UAE16.03-0.34
-2.08%
iShares MSCI UAE ETF
SSUS42.26-1.27
-2.92%
Day Hagan/Ned Davis Rsrch Smrt Sect ETF
BBAX49.02-1.51
-2.99%
JPMorgan BetaBuilders Dev APAC ex-JpnETF

LTSRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LTSRF has been loosely correlated with ISENF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 43% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LTSRF jumps, then ISENF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LTSRF
1D Price
Change %
LTSRF100%
-1.68%
ISENF - LTSRF
43%
Loosely correlated
-4.15%
BNNLF - LTSRF
40%
Loosely correlated
-5.98%
EU - LTSRF
40%
Loosely correlated
+0.93%
UEC - LTSRF
40%
Loosely correlated
-5.04%
DYLLF - LTSRF
38%
Loosely correlated
-0.14%
More

NWCCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NWCCF and LITM have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NWCCF and LITM's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NWCCF
1D Price
Change %
NWCCF100%
N/A
LITM - NWCCF
23%
Poorly correlated
+347.81%
CHXMF - NWCCF
20%
Poorly correlated
-1.84%
SAGGF - NWCCF
15%
Poorly correlated
-6.67%
SLVDF - NWCCF
13%
Poorly correlated
+0.50%
LTSRF - NWCCF
12%
Poorly correlated
-1.68%
More