Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LTUCX vs VMBSX
LTUCX vs VMBSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LTUCX vs. VMBSX commentary
Nov 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LTUCX is a Hold and VMBSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VMBSX has more cash in the bank: 16.2B vs. LTUCX (93.1M). VMBSX pays higher dividends than LTUCX: VMBSX (4.15) vs LTUCX (2.42). LTUCX was incepted earlier than VMBSX: LTUCX (31 years) vs VMBSX (16 years). LTUCX (1.84) is less costly to investors than VMBSX (0.06). VMBSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 79.00 vs. LTUCX (32.26). VMBSX has a lower initial minimum investment than LTUCX: VMBSX (3000) vs LTUCX (5000). VMBSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.40 vs. LTUCX (5.58). LTUCX return over 5 years is better than : 0.36 vs. VMBSX (-0.01).
| LTUCX | VMBSX | LTUCX / VMBSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.24 | 0.06 | 2,067% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.84 | 0.06 | 3,067% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.608 | 7.522 | 75% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000 | 3000 | 167% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 93.1M | 16.2B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.42 | 4.15 | 58% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.58 | 7.40 | 75% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.32 | 15.70 | 78% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.36 | -0.01 | -4,645% |
| Returns for 10 years | 8.31 | 14.31 | 58% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement