LU
Price
$2.89
Change
+$0.04 (+1.40%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
2.41B
9 days until earnings call
PRPS
Price
$0.42
Change
-$0.17 (-28.33%)
Updated
Aug 13 closing price
Capitalization
3.82M
Interact to see
Advertisement

LU vs PRPS

Header iconLU vs PRPS Comparison
Open Charts LU vs PRPSBanner chart's image
Lufax Holding
Price$2.89
Change+$0.04 (+1.40%)
Volume$1.04M
Capitalization2.41B
PROPELLUS
Price$0.42
Change-$0.17 (-28.33%)
Volume$5.6K
Capitalization3.82M
LU vs PRPS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
LU
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PRPS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LU vs. PRPS commentary
Aug 17, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LU is a Hold and PRPS is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 17, 2025
Stock price -- (LU: $2.89 vs. PRPS: $0.43)
Brand notoriety: LU and PRPS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Savings Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LU: 45% vs. PRPS: 163%
Market capitalization -- LU: $2.41B vs. PRPS: $3.82M
LU [@Savings Banks] is valued at $2.41B. PRPS’s [@Savings Banks] market capitalization is $3.82M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Savings Banks] industry ranges from $668.6B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Savings Banks] industry is $21.61B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LU’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whilePRPS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • LU’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • PRPS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, LU is a better buy in the long-term than PRPS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LU’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PRPS’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LU’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • PRPS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LU is a better buy in the short-term than PRPS.

Price Growth

LU (@Savings Banks) experienced а +2.12% price change this week, while PRPS (@Savings Banks) price change was -29.17% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Savings Banks industry was +2.49%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.08%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.58%.

Reported Earning Dates

LU is expected to report earnings on Aug 26, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Savings Banks (+2.49% weekly)

A savings bank primary function is to take deposits and paying interest on those deposits. Originating in Europe during the 18th century, these banks were generally introduced to incentivize people of all stripes to save money and park them with banks. By the 1990s, the internet ushered in online savings banks that allowed savers to deposit/transact with banks digitally, without requiring to visit a branch office. Savings banks have potentially encouraged lower-income population to save and have access to a financial institution to earn interest on their money. New York Community Bancorp, Inc, Webster Financial Corporation, Washington Federal, Inc. are examples of savings banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LU($2.41B) has a higher market cap than PRPS($3.82M). LU YTD gains are higher at: 20.921 vs. PRPS (-59.524). PRPS has less debt than LU: PRPS (32.3K) vs LU (47.6B). LU has higher revenues than PRPS: LU (20.3B) vs PRPS (3.03M).
LUPRPSLU / PRPS
Capitalization2.41B3.82M62,961%
EBITDAN/A-1.65M-
Gain YTD20.921-59.524-35%
P/E Ratio20.60N/A-
Revenue20.3B3.03M669,746%
Total CashN/A6.51K-
Total Debt47.6B32.3K147,368,421%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PRPS: Fundamental Ratings
PRPS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
10
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
93
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LUPRPS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
52%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
76%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 19 days ago
85%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
89%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LU
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PRPS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BIIB138.603.66
+2.71%
Biogen
SLI2.940.07
+2.44%
Standard Lithium Ltd
ATER0.95-0.01
-0.99%
Aterian
SMPL28.41-0.63
-2.17%
Simply Good Foods Company (The)
PLX1.48-0.04
-2.63%
Protalix BioTherapeutics

LU and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LU has been loosely correlated with YRD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LU jumps, then YRD could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LU
1D Price
Change %
LU100%
+1.40%
YRD - LU
48%
Loosely correlated
-0.17%
LX - LU
47%
Loosely correlated
+0.75%
QFIN - LU
46%
Loosely correlated
-4.05%
FINV - LU
46%
Loosely correlated
+5.78%
QD - LU
32%
Poorly correlated
+10.14%
More